News for & about the philosophy profession

Which Philosophy Ideas Make for Good Costumes? (redux)

Are we making progress in philosophy? Or at least in philosophy-themed costumes? Here’s one way to find out.

Ten years ago, I put up a post asking which philosophy ideas make for good Halloween costumes.

I included some suggestions:

Yes, Brain in Vat. We all think we’ve thought of that one already. What else?

Eternal Recurrence? You went as that last year! And the year before.

I suppose you could go as anything. Just make a sign that says “p & ¬ p” and walk behind it.

How would you go about dressing up as the Categorical Imperative? Remember, it would have to be the kind of costume everyone could wear.

Looking for a sexy costume idea? Go as Philosophy Department Budget. It barely covers anything.

Readers came through with various ideas: turtles all the way down, Moore’s hands, a duck-rabbit, and so on. You can check them out here.

But we barely scratched the surface of possibilities. Since it has been a decade, I thought we could revisit the topic.

There certainly seems to be room for growth, especially when it comes to ideas developed, say, over the past 30 or so years, or ideas from outside the traditional canon. Plus, there are plenty of people reading these words who were not in DN’s audience back in the day, and I bet they’ll have some good suggestions. So let’s hear ’em.

Happy Halloween, philosofriends!


related: previous Halloween posts

Fordham University Applied Ethics Master's Program

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
It’s easy
It’s easy
11 months ago

Philosophical zombie

Theorist
Theorist
11 months ago

Go as you are, and if anyone asks, say you’re dressed up as “non-ideal theory”

Rob
Rob
11 months ago

Transformative Experience: bring a few outfits with you and spend the evening changing into them.

Flash Sheridan
11 months ago

Somewhat off-topic, but when I was testing a compiler for a new language, I amortized my wedding Tuxedo (two years in a row — does that count as Eternal Recurrence?) by going as AxLang Formal Verification. Sadly, a blockchain language never had a realistic chance of the sort of functional purity needed for formal verification.

Riddle
Riddle
11 months ago

bleen or grue

Nicolas Delon
Nicolas Delon
11 months ago

An LLM-generated publication in Noûs.

Gray Banana
Gray Banana
11 months ago

Banana suit over a gray outfit, and insist that you are in fact a grayscale banana seen-as yellow. If someone insists you are a yellow banana, tell them they forgot their Fodor costume.

AK Anderson
AK Anderson
11 months ago

Ockham’s Razor!

A Philosopher Named Slickback
A Philosopher Named Slickback
11 months ago

Unrestricted composition. Just stand next to everything and make something new.

undisclosed commenter
undisclosed commenter
11 months ago

The number 42.

Hey Nonny Mouse
Hey Nonny Mouse
11 months ago

Buridan’s Ass
Descartes’ Demon
An Honest Man
The God of the Gaps
Hobbes’ Leviathan
Hume’s Fork
Rawls’ Veil of Ignorance
Russell’s Teapot
The Third Man
A Web of Beliefs

Marketeer
Marketeer
11 months ago

Go as God (never show up to the party)

Applying to PhD
Applying to PhD
11 months ago

The problem of induction: An outfit covered with 250 miniature white swans, and one somewhat hidden miniature black swan.

David Wallace
David Wallace
11 months ago

One of my students suggested going as a non-black non-raven.

Felix
Felix
11 months ago

Walking around with a large ceramic jar. Doubles for storing candy.

Kenny Easwaran
11 months ago

When I was in grad school I went as a bound variable – I borrowed some fetish cuffs and leather pants from someone I knew, and painted “x” on a torn t-shirt. A friend of mine went as an existentialist quantifier – she wore a black turtleneck with a beret and a cigarette holder, and attached a piece of paper with a backwards E.

Sara Ghaffari
Sara Ghaffari
11 months ago

I did duck rabbit one year. Could have been executed better.

Patrick Lin
11 months ago

Sorry, I’m late here. A couple ideas (for next year):

  • Supererogatory
  • Rigid designators

Use your filthy imaginations…

18
0
Click here to commentx
()
x