This past Sunday’s edition of the Star-Ledger, the leading New Jersey-based newspaper, published five brief proposals to “upgrade democracy” authored by political philosophers and theorists, alongside assessments of their practicality by scholars from Rutgers’ Eagleton Institute of Politics.
The proposals were “Election by Lottery” by Alex Guerrero (Rutgers), “Digital Democracy” by Hélène Landemore (Yale), “Proportional Voting” by Jason Brennan (Georgetown), “Direct Democracy” by Sanford Levinson (Texas), and “Basic Income” by Derrick Darby (Michigan). You can read the proposals here. The practical appraisals, offered by Ashley Koning, Elizabeth C. Matto and John Weingart, are here.
This particular instance of public philosophy came about through collaboration with the media relations team at Rutgers University, and serves as a reminder to philosophers to make use of the media connections and expertise of the people in their universities’ public relations / press/ media offices when figuring out effective ways to share their work with the public.
Alex Guerrero writes, “I had a really good experience working with the PR team at Rutgers to make connections with the media, and it seems like a resource that is probably under-utilized by philosophers at many colleges and universities… The connection happened only because someone on the PR team watched The Good Place, thought it would be fun to have a piece with a philosopher talking about the show, and so reached out to our department. There then was a kind of brainstorming with a few faculty about topics that people worked on that might be of public interest, and how to pitch them, and things went from there. It seems a good way of broadening public exposure to philosophy, connecting with different forms of media coverage (it is what lead me to have my work discussed on talk radio), etc. I would have never thought about reaching out to our Media Relations/PR team with ideas and pitches relating to philosophy, but I’d now definitely recommend that to others.”