Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

About
Comments Policy
Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
Philosophy Comics
Value of Philosophy
Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.
Non-Academic Hires
Supporters
Heap of Links

2017

Tag

A Brief Look Back at 2017

What did philosophers talk about in 2017?
(more…)

January 2, 2018 0 4

Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

On the market on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

I think a lot of junior people (whose papers won't be read widely enough for anyone to know) worry that their ideas will be stolen […]

Matt L on New Series on David Lewis from Hi-Phi Nation (guest post)

it is a ridiculous inference, as everyone was waving flags after 9/11. I have never met Lewis, and have no opinion on his political beliefs, but […]

Matt L on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

In the case of some of the journals that I have refereed for, there is a question in the editorial manager system about the paper […]

Craig Agule on New Series on David Lewis from Hi-Phi Nation (guest post)

I started listening last night—really great so far! Thanks for putting this together.

Lynn on Journal News: Philosophical Psychology and Neuroethics (guest post)

Philosophical Psychology is also now on Twitter! @JournalPHP

David Wallace on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

This is why people should put their submitted papers on a preprint archive.

JDRox on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

The journal in question was triple blind, so it would be fairly difficult for most forms of bias to have affected the decision. (At least

ehz on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

Maybe this is a good opportunity to remind people about the APA Journal Survey Project: https://apasurvey.philx.org/, where you can anonymously submit information about time to […]

Elizabeth Finneron-Burns on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

The current publishing model doesn't allow for the most selective journals to publish every 'accept' paper they receive, so editors obviously need to make those […]

Sherry Ackerman, PhD (Philosophy) on An Opportunity for "Serious Conversations on Great Books" (guest post)

Absolutely! They are not called The Great Books for nothing. Perennial wisdom.

Ian on New Series on David Lewis from Hi-Phi Nation (guest post)

Loved the first episode!

Zena Hitz on An Opportunity for "Serious Conversations on Great Books" (guest post)

Thank you so much for the dope reply. I think great books are usually parts of traditions (books which rely on or respond to […]

Subscribe

Archives

Paid Advertisements

Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

“That comedy is an important social safety valve and sometimes an epistemically useful window in a democracy also entails that it may be socially dangerous” -- Eric Schliesser (Amsterdam) on Chappelle, Srinivasan, Letterman, Trump, Aristophanes, and Socrates
“To compromise on the detail is to change the subject” -- an enjoyable and informative essay by Emmanuel Ordóñez Angulo (Oxford) on the challenges to and varieties of popularization in philosophy and mathematics
Speaker series on the nature of belief -- from the Concepts & Cognition Lab, hosted by Tania Lombrozo (Princeton) and Neil Van Leeuwen (Georgia State)
New publication by John Locke -- "the discovered manuscript provides the first evidence of Locke's commitment to the principle that minimalistic theism would suffice for peaceable coexistence in any civil society"
Reconceiving abortion as a public good -- so that the state has a compelling interest in people having access to it
“The position that I have in philosophy—I grew up poor, I am a Black woman, et cetera—means I have… very different evidence of what the stuff of anger actually looks like” -- Myisha Cherry (UC Riverside) interviewed in The New Yorker about anger and philosophy
What are and what should be the limits on scientific freedom? -- Heather Douglas (Michigan State) talks with Maria Kronfeldner (CEU) as part of a series on socially engaged philosophy
“The political/ideological takeover is the practice of using political positions to drive our philosophy (or drive out the rest of philosophy), rather than the other way around” -- an interview with Michael Huemer (Colorado) at What Is It Like To Be A Philosopher
Moral progress and moral methodology -- a conversation between Philip Kitcher (Columbia) and Julia Hermann (Utrecht) (scroll to the end for the link to the video)
“There is nothing in the nature of academic research that guarantees that ‘the best ideas of a generation will become part of the canon for the next generation’; instead, many good and original ideas have been lost to the disciplines through bad luck” -- consider, for example, the case of Ludwik Fleck
“There can be a lot of natural values, all equally valuable and natural, but different ones need different circumstances or social settings to be realized—so they will occur or flower at different times/places” -- an interview with Rachel Zuckert (Northwestern), who pays attention to "real tensions real facts about art and our appreciation of it"
“The life I lived, inside the walls of the house and outside, was in fact not one life but two, lives that sometimes complemented and supported each other, but mostly clashed against a reality I could not fully grasp” -- a profile of political philosophy Lea Ypi (LSE)
“Never call yourself a philosopher — let others do that” -- Spencer Case's appreciation of philosopher Bill McCurdy
“To ask only questions we can answer is a failure of imagination” -- a brief appreciation of philosophy from Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside)
“Imagining is not an alternative to reality and rationality or a diminished form of it. Imagining is a complementary form in our ways of knowing” -- Luca Tateo (Oslo) on a unified theory of imagining
The mathematics of heaps “looks like a living process” -- not about philosophy but this is the "heap" of links so file this under self-understanding
There will be a virtual memorial for Charles Mills on Sunday October 10, 2021, from 2pm to 5pm, EDT -- details are on the new Charles Mills memorial website
Audio of philosophy of science lectures from Voice of America’s “Forum: The Arts & Sciences in Mid-Century America” (1963) -- the series includes Quine, Hempel, Goodman, Black, Nagel, Putnam, Levi, Morgenbesser, Feyerabend, Suppes, and others (via Boaz Miller)
“What are memoirists doing exactly, when we claim to ‘find’ this form and meaning in our past experience? Are we genuinely discovering it back there or just making it up?” -- Helena de Bres (Wellesley) on the philosophy of memoirs
“My model of the world is that there are many, many, many thinkers, ideas and texts that are sufficiently interesting to merit serious consideration” -- why Liam Kofi Bright (LSE) opposes philosophical canons
“In sex of all things, where humans so often misconstrue what other humans want… can we ever trust ourselves to know, really know, what an animal wants?” -- Amia Srinivasan (Oxford) takes an unflinching look at bestiality
In Memo Akten’s ‘Learning To See’, “an artificial neural network loosely inspired by our own visual cortex, looks through cameras and tries to make sense of what it sees” -- "Of course it can only see what it already knows. Just like us."
“It is morally imperative to not say true things on social media” -- Justin E. H. Smith on the "false representative class" today's technology has spawned
“The visual image can no longer compete. Video is dead. Videogames seek to evolve into—or devolve back into—text-based games, so far with little success” -- a fascinating short story from philosopher John Holbo (NUS) about a world in which how people read has radically changed
“I sometimes wonder whether it’s news to most philosophers that ‘A = A’ can be funny and even is the structure, or the form, of the perfect joke” -- a philosopher's appreciation of comedian Norm McDonald, who died in September
It’s likely we’ll find that “being conscious, much like being alive, has many different properties that will express in different ways… among different species, among different systems” -- and so, says neuroscientist Anil Seth, "the mystery of consciousness may dissolve"
“One reason most humanities professors wouldn’t consider themselves humanists: they’re too busy pretending to be scientists” -- by looking at the ideas of Charles Babbitt, we can see reasons to "jumpstart an omni-cultural humanist revival"
A Facebook group for faculty and graduate students in philosophy who were first-generation college students -- created by Georgi Gardiner (Tennessee)
“Our knowledge of ourselves is (meta)knowledge like any other – hard-won, and always subject to revision” -- Stephen M. Fleming (UCL) on the science of metacognition
“We don’t even claim that it is rehabilitative, although it might be, but we do claim that it takes people seriously” -- an article about philosophy in prisons, based on discussions with MM McCabe and Mike Coxhead (KCL)

∙ 2021 ©Daily Nous ∙