Philosopher-Led Project on AI and Evolving Norms of Inquiry
How is the development and use of artificial intelligence changing the norms of inquiry and knowledge production across different disciplines?

That’s the question to be taken up by Eamon Duede, assistant professor of philosophy at Purdue University, as part of a new interdisciplinary, multi-institutional project.
Called “AI & Evolving Disciplinary Norms of Inquiry,” the project is being supported with a $250,000 grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Here’s his description of it:
This project seeks to understand how the rapid integration of artificial intelligence is transforming the norms that govern how different scientific and scholarly disciplines produce, justify, and communicate knowledge. It begins from the observation that AI systems are no longer confined to domain-specific applications but are increasingly capable of participating in every stage of inquiry, from hypothesis generation to data analysis and publication. The project investigates whether such general-purpose technologies will enrich discipline centered inquiry or erode it by homogenizing epistemic practices across fields. To answer this, it combines conceptual and empirical methods: convening interdisciplinary workshops to study how diverse disciplines negotiate AI’s entry into their practices, and conducting a rich, empirical study of the role of AI in the formal mathematics community as a model case for observing how AI reshapes standards of proof, collaboration, and problem valuation. Together, these efforts aim to produce both theoretical understanding, frameworks, and practical guidance for integrating AI into science in ways that preserve the richness and heterogeneity of disciplinary inquiry.
You can learn more about the project and some opportunities for joining it here.
I think Daily Nous should just rebrand as Daily AI already.
I mean, it’s not going away anytime soon. Most people taking the question seriously seem to think it’s just going to be more of a deal as time goes on, though there is considerable variance regarding timelines and milestones. Like many previous technologies, it has serious implications for philosophy. We might want it to go away, or be less of a deal, I know I do, but the world is under no obligation to accede to our wishes. We might as well embrace the opportunity we have while we look for new opportunities to steer the world in a better direction.
Welcome and embrace it. There is no antidote for hemlock.
Ah, yes. As Socrates famously said: the philosophers should chase the money and societal fads. We are a social …fly – it’s fly, right. Feasting on dung.
Aily Nous
D.A.I. Nous
Out of the last 50 posts I counted four (maybe five) AI-related posts. That’s still only about 8-10%, I’d say too soon for a rebranding.
Looks like a fantastic project