Mini-Heap
New additions to the Heap…

- “The careless adage that Plato banished poetry should itself be banished” — Elaine Scarry makes the case, and argues that though “philosophy and poetry are distinct inventions… each suffers by keeping the other at arm’s length”
- The “Why Philosophy?” interviews are back — Céline Leboeuf has interviewed Olivia Sun and Eric Schwitzgebel recently
- “Our goal is not simply to make more common knowledge. Instead… we proceed cautiously, admitting one thing and hiding another in order to carefully manage our affiliations” — a different kind of social epistemology? Joshua Rothman on Steven Pinker
- Over two dozen video interviews about disagreeing well — by Emma Lee, a recent high school graduate who has now partnered with The Philosophy Foundation to develop resources for teaching disagreement in schools
- In 2021, Russ Shafer-Landau delivered an APA Presidential address that took the form of 20 questions in moral philosophy — he’s puzzled by them, he says, but optimistic that we can get closer to resolving them
- “It may be really hard—if not impossible—to separate ‘what brains do from what they are’, and yet still accept that what they do is, in fact, compute” — Felipe De Brigard on computational complexity and consciousness
- Funding for your Philosophy, Politics, and Economics project — Geoff Sayre-McCord hosts a webinar this Wednesday (today) on PPE grants from $10,000 to $150,000
Mini-Heap posts usually appear when several new items accumulate in the Heap of Links, a collection of items from around the web that may be of interest to philosophers. The Heap of Links consists partly of suggestions from readers; if you find something online that you think would be of interest to the philosophical community, please send it in for consideration for the Heap. Thank you.
Previous edition.
A complementary piece to Rothman’s on Pinker, from Becca Rothfeld:
“This is the kind of public intellectualism that makes the public hate intellectuals. Instead of showing what ideas have to teach us about life, Pinker holds a gun to life’s head and demands it conform to his thought experiments.”
A short blog post for the end of the week: A Jain-like philosophy of law? (comments here or a the blog most welcome)