Philosophy Book to Become Movie


“Here’s the pitch: it’s a philosophy movie…”
“Huh.”
“based on a philosophy book…”
“I’m listening.”
“by an actual philosopher.”
“Go on.”
“That is, a philosophy professor.”
“You don’t say.”
“An analytic philosophy professor.”
“Sold!”

Okay, that’s not how it happened.

But somehow, Tetralogue, by Timothy Williamson, Senior Research Fellow and Emeritus Wykeham Professor of Logic at the University of Oxford, is getting made into a movie.

The book, published in 2015, isn’t a typical philosophical monograph. It recounts a fictional conversation among four strangers on a train, each with differing views, who discuss and argue about a variety of subjects.

It was one of several books included in a book club of actors and philosophers begun by director Jorge Valdés-Iga during the Covid-19 pandemic. Valdés-Iga invited Professor Williamson to join their final session on his book. Williamson said he was impressed by the discussion, and Valdés-Iga, who must have been impressed by the book, came up with the idea of making a movie of it.

Williamson says that he and Valdés-Iga have been in occasional communication about the film. “We talk about the characters, how they speak and feel,” he says. “Much of the original dialogue will be preserved, though there will be a bit more action than in the book. Jorge needs space to develop it in a way that he feels will work on screen, which of course isn’t the same as what works on the page.”

The casting for the movie is being done right now (over 6000 actors applied). “I’m impressed at how many of them are able to bring the words to life,” Williamson says.

The movie, titled Tetralogue, will be filmed in November. The plan is to show it initially at film festivals in 2026.

Your suggestions for film adaptations of other philosophy books are welcome.

guest

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Wallace
David Wallace
9 months ago

I believe Ted Sider is a consultant on “Shooting the Film of the World”, but I don’t know how faithful an adaptation it is.

Boolos’s Logic, Logic, and Logic would be an excellent trilogy.

I’d consider a franchise based around Putnam’s various books, but I’m concerned there would be a lot of complaints about continuity. (Studios are a bit burned after the very divisive reaction to the sequel to Tractatus.)

Charles Pigden
Reply to  David Wallace
9 months ago

Yes but with the Putnam trilogy there would be a satisfying story arc: RISE Collected Paper volumes 1& 2; FALL, Reason Truth and History plus Collected Papers Volume 2; REPENTANCE AND REDEMPTION though being re-baptised as a scientific realist in his later works.

Charles Pigden
Reply to  Charles Pigden
9 months ago

SHOULD HAVE BEEN

Yes, but with the Putnam trilogy there would be a satisfying story arc: RISE, Collected Papers volumes 1 & 2; FALL, Reason Truth and History plus Collected Papers Volume 3; REPENTANCE AND REDEMPTION through being re-baptised as a scientific realist in his later works.

Eyeroll
Eyeroll
9 months ago

-“An analytic philosophy professor.”
-“Sold!”

Oh, brother.

Chris Stephens
Chris Stephens
9 months ago

We made a movie out of Sterelny and Griffiths book, Sex and Death, but a lot of people left early, thinking it would be about something else.

Mahmoud Jalloh
Mahmoud Jalloh
9 months ago

I have failed to have the right Hollywood connections materialize (though I’m back in the arena, so we’ll see), but I am always telling people that a biopic of Socrates could be an slam dunk of a blockbuster. Obviously much of the script comes ready-made.

Blobfish
Blobfish
Reply to  Mahmoud Jalloh
9 months ago

Rossellini got there first, I am afraid. “Socrate” (1970)

Michel
9 months ago

Here I thought it would be Suits’s _The Grasshopper_.

Iqbal Hussain
Iqbal Hussain
9 months ago

I’d like to see a movie based on the life of Bertrand Russell. It would have all the ingredients of a hit–his run-in with the establishments of the day, lots of romance and sex, street scenes with protesters, and of course dialogue replete with Russell’s biting wit reflecting his humungous intellect.

Good news!
Good news!
Reply to  Iqbal Hussain
9 months ago
Flash Sheridan
Reply to  Iqbal Hussain
9 months ago

Believe it or not, my wife and I have seen two plays about Lord Russell:

  • Ludwig and Bertie:
A Comedy of Ideas http://ludwigbertie.com/, by Douglas Lackey, a philosophy professor at Baruch College, CUNY. My notes: We both enjoyed it. I seemed to be the only one in the audience who hissed when the actor portraying Wittgenstein (whose autograph Olga got for me) denied the existence of the set of all sets. [Cp. A Closer Look at the Russell Paradox,” Logique et Analyse Vol 262 (2023–4), pp. 125-146, DOI: 10.2143/LEA.262.0.3293616.]
  • Theater&…math, a presentation by Cooper Kofron ’24: https://arts.princeton.edu/events/theater-math-a-presentation-by-cooper-kofron-24/ It’s 1903. Bertrand, Alfred, Alys, and Evelyn have just moved into a house together. Bertrand and Alfred are trying to prove that 1+1 is actually 2. Alys and Evelyn are trying to figure out why they married their husbands in the first place. Both of these tasks will ultimately take 10 years. Based on a true story. A reading of a play-in-progress about math, faith, and unfaithfulness.

Happy to help fund cinematic versions of either or both as soon as someone sets up a Kickstarter page.

Tom Hurka
Tom Hurka
Reply to  Flash Sheridan
9 months ago

In 1977 I saw, at the Edinburgh Festival, a play also called Ludwig and Bertie. It was, if I recall correctly, by a student group from Durham University and was about Wittgenstein and Russell … and Bertie Wooster and Jeeves. It was hilarious. Wittgenstein and Russell are to have their first meeting at the same place Bertie is to meet his new butler for the first time. So Russell arrives when Bertie does, thinks Bertie is Wittgenstein, and concludes after talking to him that Wittgenstein is the stupidest person he’s ever met. After Russell leaves Wittgenstein enters, thinks Bertie is Russell, and likewise concludes … At the end Jeeves solves everything by proposing the Theory of Descriptions. There are also little jokes, e.g. Bertie is looking for a book on moral philosophy to explain all about this Categorical Aperitif.

Flash Sheridan
Reply to  Tom Hurka
9 months ago

I’m trying to reread the Tractatus, and hence have some sympathy for that view. I can testify that Professor Lackey’s play, though it has a similar title, has a distinct plot and dramatis personæ list. I will, however, extend my Kickstarter pledge to cover the original Ludwig and Bertie as well.

Joe
Joe
9 months ago

I have plans to adapt the Critique of Pure Reason into a film.

Last edited 9 months ago by Joe
Charlie Lassiter
Reply to  Joe
9 months ago

dammit, I’ve been scooped again!

Bill Vanderburgh
Reply to  Joe
9 months ago

The A version or the B version?

Steve
Steve
9 months ago

It’s not strictly a philosophy book, but I’d love a film adaptation of Adam Roberts’ novel “The Thing Itself”. (If you don’t already know it, Roberts’ novel is a very clever, very funny mash-up of the John Carpenter movie, “The Thing” and the First Critique).

Sam Duncan
Sam Duncan
Reply to  Steve
9 months ago

I’ll second “The Thing Itself”. It’s not just a great novel but Roberts clearly understands Kant quite well.
I’m not sure if you’ve read them but he’s got a couple of others that riff on philosophy. “The This” does Hegel and “Lake of Darkness” is inspired by Deleuze’s book on Leibniz. “The This” isn’t bad but isn’t at all on the same level as “The Thing Itself.” “Lake of Darkness” is on par with it though and it’s creepy as hell. It’d be a very good pick for a Halloween read.

Daniil
Daniil
9 months ago

I am surprised that I haven’t seen any film adaptations of Plato’s Dialogues.

Ben Laurence
Ben Laurence
9 months ago

This is wonderful