Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
Chaospet
Home

Chaospet

By
Justin Weinberg
. February 9, 2021 at 1:10 pm 1

Chaospet
by Ryan Lake

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info about DN Comics
Ryan Lake on Twitter

13 likes
Login
guest
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alan White
Alan White
8 months ago

A phenomenal Locke-down argument.Report

0
Reply
Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

Non-native on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

I think these considerations lack a bit of nuance. Two counterweights should be taken into consideration. First, in most of these job markets, applicants will still […]
Yael on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

I don’t want to flood the discussion, so I’m just going to point out that socioeconomic background is not the only determinant of access to […]
Michel on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

Not if they're less competitive on the Anglophone (especially American) market, since that's a much larger market. I take it that's the point.
tenure track on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

P.S. The non-western example wasn't equating non-native speakers and non-westerners, but was one example of how non-native speakers can have advantages. German philosophy would work […]
tenure track on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

Hi Non-Native, Thanks for your response. I think we're talking past each other to extent. For example, we both seem to agree that there are advantages […]
On the market on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

There are a lot of jobs that require speaking a language other than England. For example, most jobs in Germany, Austria, France, Spain, Switzerland, and […]
Non-native on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

Hi TT, thanks for your clarificaiton. I still stand by my comments above, and think that your intervention is somewhat offensive and out of place. […]
Conrad on Enough Ranking (guest post)

I too agree that the perfect should be the enemy of the good.
Silos on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

I wouldn't want to make any general claim about silos in philosophy, but it does seem like the two specific philosophical approaches we've been discussing […]
tenure track on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

I'm not sure why you're attributing to me things I neither said nor implied, but it's worth pointing out that this is what you're doing. […]
Matt L on Data on Philosophy PhDs in Non-Academic Positions

When I was in law school (I was working on my PhD in philosophy at the same time) I knew a handful of people who […]
Mich on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

Some coauthorships are predatory. Coauthorships inflation is occurring in every discipline because it lets senior people get credit for little to no work.

Subscribe

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

  • “The position that I have in philosophy—I grew up poor, I am a Black woman, et cetera—means I have… very different evidence of what the stuff of anger actually looks like” -- Myisha Cherry (UC Riverside) interviewed in The New Yorker about anger and philosophy
  • What are and what should be the limits on scientific freedom? -- Heather Douglas (Michigan State) talks with Maria Kronfeldner (CEU) as part of a series on socially engaged philosophy
  • “The political/ideological takeover is the practice of using political positions to drive our philosophy (or drive out the rest of philosophy), rather than the other way around” -- an interview with Michael Huemer (Colorado) at What Is It Like To Be A Philosopher
  • Moral progress and moral methodology -- a conversation between Philip Kitcher (Columbia) and Julia Hermann (Utrecht) (scroll to the end for the link to the video)
  • “There is nothing in the nature of academic research that guarantees that ‘the best ideas of a generation will become part of the canon for the next generation’; instead, many good and original ideas have been lost to the disciplines through bad luck” -- consider, for example, the case of Ludwik Fleck
  • “There can be a lot of natural values, all equally valuable and natural, but different ones need different circumstances or social settings to be realized—so they will occur or flower at different times/places” -- an interview with Rachel Zuckert (Northwestern), who pays attention to "real tensions real facts about art and our appreciation of it"
  • “The life I lived, inside the walls of the house and outside, was in fact not one life but two, lives that sometimes complemented and supported each other, but mostly clashed against a reality I could not fully grasp” -- a profile of political philosophy Lea Ypi (LSE)
  • “Never call yourself a philosopher — let others do that” -- Spencer Case's appreciation of philosopher Bill McCurdy
  • “To ask only questions we can answer is a failure of imagination” -- a brief appreciation of philosophy from Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside)
  • “Imagining is not an alternative to reality and rationality or a diminished form of it. Imagining is a complementary form in our ways of knowing” -- Luca Tateo (Oslo) on a unified theory of imagining
  • The mathematics of heaps “looks like a living process” -- not about philosophy but this is the "heap" of links so file this under self-understanding
  • There will be a virtual memorial for Charles Mills on Sunday October 10, 2021, from 2pm to 5pm, EDT -- details are on the new Charles Mills memorial website
  • Audio of philosophy of science lectures from Voice of America’s “Forum: The Arts & Sciences in Mid-Century America” (1963) -- the series includes Quine, Hempel, Goodman, Black, Nagel, Putnam, Levi, Morgenbesser, Feyerabend, Suppes, and others (via Boaz Miller)
  • “What are memoirists doing exactly, when we claim to ‘find’ this form and meaning in our past experience? Are we genuinely discovering it back there or just making it up?” -- Helena de Bres (Wellesley) on the philosophy of memoirs
  • “My model of the world is that there are many, many, many thinkers, ideas and texts that are sufficiently interesting to merit serious consideration” -- why Liam Kofi Bright (LSE) opposes philosophical canons
  • “In sex of all things, where humans so often misconstrue what other humans want… can we ever trust ourselves to know, really know, what an animal wants?” -- Amia Srinivasan (Oxford) takes an unflinching look at bestiality
  • In Memo Akten’s ‘Learning To See’, “an artificial neural network loosely inspired by our own visual cortex, looks through cameras and tries to make sense of what it sees” -- "Of course it can only see what it already knows. Just like us."
  • “It is morally imperative to not say true things on social media” -- Justin E. H. Smith on the "false representative class" today's technology has spawned
  • “The visual image can no longer compete. Video is dead. Videogames seek to evolve into—or devolve back into—text-based games, so far with little success” -- a fascinating short story from philosopher John Holbo (NUS) about a world in which how people read has radically changed
  • “I sometimes wonder whether it’s news to most philosophers that ‘A = A’ can be funny and even is the structure, or the form, of the perfect joke” -- a philosopher's appreciation of comedian Norm McDonald, who died in September
  • It’s likely we’ll find that “being conscious, much like being alive, has many different properties that will express in different ways… among different species, among different systems” -- and so, says neuroscientist Anil Seth, "the mystery of consciousness may dissolve"
  • “One reason most humanities professors wouldn’t consider themselves humanists: they’re too busy pretending to be scientists” -- by looking at the ideas of Charles Babbitt, we can see reasons to "jumpstart an omni-cultural humanist revival"
  • A Facebook group for faculty and graduate students in philosophy who were first-generation college students -- created by Georgi Gardiner (Tennessee)
  • “Our knowledge of ourselves is (meta)knowledge like any other – hard-won, and always subject to revision” -- Stephen M. Fleming (UCL) on the science of metacognition
  • “We don’t even claim that it is rehabilitative, although it might be, but we do claim that it takes people seriously” -- an article about philosophy in prisons, based on discussions with MM McCabe and Mike Coxhead (KCL)
  • “The fact that the term ‘mob’ can function pejoratively creates a paradox” -- an interview with Susanna Siegel (Harvard) on mob violence and vigilantism
  • “Rationality is systematized winning.” “It’s not winning I’m worried about… I want to know the truth.” -- a teacher and a student talk about the limits of rationality
  • Is the ball helping the mouse get to the cheese? -- Do we "see" free will? After watching the video, click on the PDF link for an explanation of a new "perceptual" approach to free will attribution.
  • “As a scholar, I could not do my job if I accepted the sort of ‘reasoning’ we are given for the cruel arrangements under which we labor” -- "And that is the fundamental bullshit on which all the bullshit sits," writes Amy Olberding (Oklahoma)
  • “In everyday life we often experience cities as beautiful… however, the city is only a marginal topic in aesthetics” -- Tea Lobo (Collegium Helveticum) on the aesthetics of cities

∙   2021 ©Daily Nous   ∙

wpDiscuz
1
0
Discussion welcome. Click to comment.x
()
x
| Reply