Are Philosophers Using Publons?

About four years ago in a post about getting credit for refereeing articles, I mentioned Publons, a site that allows you to “track your publications, citation metrics, peer reviews, and journal editing work in a single, easy-to-maintain profile.”

At the time, not many philosophers or journals appeared to be making use of Publons, but there have been increasing mentions of it, and now a number of philosophy journals are listed on it (some of which have “partnered” with the Publons, as indicated on its lists by a blue checkmark).

The philosophy journals with the most reviews as of the time of this post are:

Still, people have questions about it. One reader wrote in:

Are people using Publons? Journals are offering to give me recognitions, via Publons, for review work and I just have no idea whether it’s something worth doing. I don’t particularly care about me being recognized, but I do think it’s good if our profession can come up with ways to incentivize timely, quality reviewing. Does Publons actually do that?

Discussion welcome, especially from reviewers who use Publons or have thought about it but don’t, and editors whose journals make use of Publons.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please enter an e-mail address