Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
Mind Chunks (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)
Home
Daily Nous Features

Mind Chunks (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)

By
Justin Weinberg
. December 20, 2017 at 12:06 am 0

Mind Chunks
by Pete Mandik

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info About DN Comics / Pete Mandik on Twitter

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags Daily Nous Philosophy ComicsMind ChunksPete Mandik
7 likes
Login
guest
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

David Wallace on How Can Departments Support Grad Students in Labor Disputes?

I’m pretty sure it’s correct for Pitt specifically, because it came up in the recent unionization vote. But I can well believe it varies both
Aaron V Garrett on How Can Departments Support Grad Students in Labor Disputes?

The designation of chairs and professors as "management" is an anti-union strategy by universities. It's of course complete nonsense, insofar as they are trying to
Lisa Shapiro on How Can Departments Support Grad Students in Labor Disputes?

I'm sceptical about the claim that Chairs are not permitted to be part of faculty unions. At least at my university, the cut off for […]
David Wallace on How Can Departments Support Grad Students in Labor Disputes?

"The amount of lay-speculation about the law in this thread is a bit surprising, considering how silly that speculation almost always turns out to be." My […]
Jared on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

Regarding this phrase, which I increasingly see outside analytic philosophy: “the myth of the lone genius.” What does this refer to? Is it that anytime […]
Andrew Richmond on How Can Departments Support Grad Students in Labor Disputes?

The amount of lay-speculation about the law in this thread is a bit surprising, considering how silly that speculation almost always turns out to be. […]
Mark van Roojen on New Series on David Lewis from Hi-Phi Nation (guest post)

I'm pretty sure David was not especially right wing. But he did have a certain (possibly misplaced) sense of propriety about how academic things, including […]
Law on How Can Departments Support Grad Students in Labor Disputes?

See. Philosophy of Law: Classic and Contemporary Readings with Commentary by Frederick Schauer and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
Louis F. Cooper on New Series on David Lewis from Hi-Phi Nation (guest post)

I've listened to the whole first episode (I knew basically nothing about D. Lewis before listening), and I'd be curious if you could be a […]
Jeffrey G Blumenthal on New Series on David Lewis from Hi-Phi Nation (guest post)

Very interesting. I've only listened to the first episode, but there seems to be a clear indication that David Lewis might be autistic or on […]
Charles Young on New Plug-In Improves the SEP Experience

FWIW, the authorship of an SEP entry may be found by clicking the link “Author and Citation Info” towards the bottom of the menu on […]
Gillian Russell on Which Philosopher Co-Authors Most?

And Schotch and Jennings!

Subscribe

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

  • “Collaborations with scientists can suffer when the cultural differences between disciplines are not acknowledged and tended” -- Michael Paul Nelson (Oregon State) has some advice for scientists and philosophers working with each other
  • Demographic data about people with philosophy PhDs -- results from the recent Academic Placement and Data Analysis project
  • “Let white students simply think that a Black professor is discriminating against them based upon race and see how quickly the white students are believed” -- some black people may have racial prejudices and individual power, but, says George Yancy (Emory), that is different from systemic racism
  • “That comedy is an important social safety valve and sometimes an epistemically useful window in a democracy also entails that it may be socially dangerous” -- Eric Schliesser (Amsterdam) on Chappelle, Srinivasan, Letterman, Trump, Aristophanes, and Socrates
  • “To compromise on the detail is to change the subject” -- an enjoyable and informative essay by Emmanuel Ordóñez Angulo (Oxford) on the challenges to and varieties of popularization in philosophy and mathematics
  • Speaker series on the nature of belief -- from the Concepts & Cognition Lab, hosted by Tania Lombrozo (Princeton) and Neil Van Leeuwen (Georgia State)
  • New publication by John Locke -- "the discovered manuscript provides the first evidence of Locke's commitment to the principle that minimalistic theism would suffice for peaceable coexistence in any civil society"
  • Reconceiving abortion as a public good -- so that the state has a compelling interest in people having access to it
  • “The position that I have in philosophy—I grew up poor, I am a Black woman, et cetera—means I have… very different evidence of what the stuff of anger actually looks like” -- Myisha Cherry (UC Riverside) interviewed in The New Yorker about anger and philosophy
  • What are and what should be the limits on scientific freedom? -- Heather Douglas (Michigan State) talks with Maria Kronfeldner (CEU) as part of a series on socially engaged philosophy
  • “The political/ideological takeover is the practice of using political positions to drive our philosophy (or drive out the rest of philosophy), rather than the other way around” -- an interview with Michael Huemer (Colorado) at What Is It Like To Be A Philosopher
  • Moral progress and moral methodology -- a conversation between Philip Kitcher (Columbia) and Julia Hermann (Utrecht) (scroll to the end for the link to the video)
  • “There is nothing in the nature of academic research that guarantees that ‘the best ideas of a generation will become part of the canon for the next generation’; instead, many good and original ideas have been lost to the disciplines through bad luck” -- consider, for example, the case of Ludwik Fleck
  • “There can be a lot of natural values, all equally valuable and natural, but different ones need different circumstances or social settings to be realized—so they will occur or flower at different times/places” -- an interview with Rachel Zuckert (Northwestern), who pays attention to "real tensions real facts about art and our appreciation of it"
  • “The life I lived, inside the walls of the house and outside, was in fact not one life but two, lives that sometimes complemented and supported each other, but mostly clashed against a reality I could not fully grasp” -- a profile of political philosophy Lea Ypi (LSE)
  • “Never call yourself a philosopher — let others do that” -- Spencer Case's appreciation of philosopher Bill McCurdy
  • “To ask only questions we can answer is a failure of imagination” -- a brief appreciation of philosophy from Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside)
  • “Imagining is not an alternative to reality and rationality or a diminished form of it. Imagining is a complementary form in our ways of knowing” -- Luca Tateo (Oslo) on a unified theory of imagining
  • The mathematics of heaps “looks like a living process” -- not about philosophy but this is the "heap" of links so file this under self-understanding
  • There will be a virtual memorial for Charles Mills on Sunday October 10, 2021, from 2pm to 5pm, EDT -- details are on the new Charles Mills memorial website
  • Audio of philosophy of science lectures from Voice of America’s “Forum: The Arts & Sciences in Mid-Century America” (1963) -- the series includes Quine, Hempel, Goodman, Black, Nagel, Putnam, Levi, Morgenbesser, Feyerabend, Suppes, and others (via Boaz Miller)
  • “What are memoirists doing exactly, when we claim to ‘find’ this form and meaning in our past experience? Are we genuinely discovering it back there or just making it up?” -- Helena de Bres (Wellesley) on the philosophy of memoirs
  • “My model of the world is that there are many, many, many thinkers, ideas and texts that are sufficiently interesting to merit serious consideration” -- why Liam Kofi Bright (LSE) opposes philosophical canons
  • “In sex of all things, where humans so often misconstrue what other humans want… can we ever trust ourselves to know, really know, what an animal wants?” -- Amia Srinivasan (Oxford) takes an unflinching look at bestiality
  • In Memo Akten’s ‘Learning To See’, “an artificial neural network loosely inspired by our own visual cortex, looks through cameras and tries to make sense of what it sees” -- "Of course it can only see what it already knows. Just like us."
  • “It is morally imperative to not say true things on social media” -- Justin E. H. Smith on the "false representative class" today's technology has spawned
  • “The visual image can no longer compete. Video is dead. Videogames seek to evolve into—or devolve back into—text-based games, so far with little success” -- a fascinating short story from philosopher John Holbo (NUS) about a world in which how people read has radically changed
  • “I sometimes wonder whether it’s news to most philosophers that ‘A = A’ can be funny and even is the structure, or the form, of the perfect joke” -- a philosopher's appreciation of comedian Norm McDonald, who died in September
  • It’s likely we’ll find that “being conscious, much like being alive, has many different properties that will express in different ways… among different species, among different systems” -- and so, says neuroscientist Anil Seth, "the mystery of consciousness may dissolve"
  • “One reason most humanities professors wouldn’t consider themselves humanists: they’re too busy pretending to be scientists” -- by looking at the ideas of Charles Babbitt, we can see reasons to "jumpstart an omni-cultural humanist revival"

∙   2021 ©Daily Nous   ∙

wpDiscuz
0
0
Discussion welcome. Click to comment.x
()
x
| Reply