Stubblefield Convictions Overturned

Anna Stubblefield, the former Rutgers-Newark philosophy professor convicted of sexually assualting a disabled man, has had her convictions overturned by an appellate court, reports, on the grounds that she did not get a fair trial. The court determined she should have a new trial, with a new judge.

The decision turned, in part, on the exclusion of evidence from the original trial, particularly the testimony of Rosemary Crossely, who says she independently assessed the disabled man’s capacity for communication.

From the article at

Crossley did an extensive, three-day videoed evaluation of D.J., which sought to determine his language and literacy skills and determine if he had, “communicative intent,” the decision said. She did use FC [“facilitated communication”, a scientifically dubious form of attempting to communicate] in her assessment but nothing that she used the device for factored into her overall assessment of D.J., the defense argued.

However, her evaluation and videotape of the assessment were not brought into evidence – they were deemed unreliable because she had used FC in her assessment, the court ruled.

In the decision, the appellate court sided with Stubblefield’s defense attorneys, who claimed that by preventing Crossley from presenting her full evaluation of D.J., the court was preventing the defense attorneys from presenting their full argument.

“The jury and not the court should have ultimately determined whether Dr. Crossley’s evaluation was persuasive, and whether the state proved defendant knew or should have known that D.J. could not consent,” the appellate court ruled.

Because they couldn’t hear Crossley’s full assessment, the jury was left with the impression that no expert or other person – apart from Stubblefield herself – believed that D.J. had the mental abilities to consent to sex, the decision said…

The court went on to call the facts of the case “extraordinary,” and that they called for “a liberal admission of evidence supporting defendant’s defense.”

Read more here.

UPDATE (June 12, 2017): Inside Higher Ed reports on the story.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please enter an e-mail address