Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
Chaospet (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)
Home
Daily Nous Features

Chaospet (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)

By
Justin Weinberg
. March 8, 2016 at 12:41 pm 1

Lake - 2016-3-8 - Nietzsche - teaser

Chaospet
by Ryan Lake

Lake - 2016-3-8 - Nietzsche

Previous Daily Nous Comics / More Info about DN Comics / Ryan Lake on Twitter

Daily Nous Philosophy Comics square - Lake

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags ChaospetDaily Nous Philosophy ComicsRyan Lake
14 likes
Login
guest
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TParent
TParent
5 years ago

Love it!!Report

0
Reply
Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

ehz on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

One of the major problems in philosophy is that on any given topic philosophers can have radically different starting premises. If your journal submission goes […]
Junior Scholar on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

It is curious that the editors in this case didn't catch that the reviewers were rejecting the author's assessment of their own previous work and […]
JTD on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

Anonymous peer-review is the best of several bad options. Many reviewers do an excellent job but some are woeful in their incompetence and unprofessionalism. Anecdotally, […]
Eric Steinhart on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

Generally if something works, there's evidence that it works.
Matt on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

An idea: Single blind, double review system: 1st review is blind. 2nd review is fully transparent review of the first review (not the paper) with both author and […]
Nicolas Delon on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

I worry about that too. Editors should (and many do, internally) rate referees though.
Rob on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

While this idea has potential, I worry that the results would basically be the same as the result of student course evaluations - namely reviewers […]
Nicolas Delon on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

Pointing to systemic flaws is exactly what Salmon does in the third paragraph (e.g. referee’s veto power combined with bad faith/incompetence behind the veil of […]
Julien Murzi on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

Italy when I was a graduate student might be a useful comparison. Back then, about 15 years ago, most philosophers would publish in Italian journals […]
Julien Murzi on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

I’m an expert on topic X. I have publicly funded research projects going on, postdocs, a full teaching load, graduate students, two small children. I
Martin Peterson on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

Here is a possible alternative to the current system: Instead of asking two reviewers evaluate a single paper, we could ask a team of five […]
Douglas W. Portmore on "Incompetence", "Arrogance", "Misunderstanding"

How is the absence of evidence evidence?

Archives

  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

  • Do you have an obligation to get vaccinated? -- the answer is more complicated than you might think, argues Travis Rieder (Johns Hopkins)
  • 20 works of philosophical fiction -- a list from Book Riot
  • “Do we really need a theory of instrumental rationality?” -- we do, says Sergio Tenenbaum (Toronto), and he is explaining why and what it should look like at Brains this week
  • “Spock is held up as this exemplar of logic and reason and rationality” -- but he's really "a straw man... of reason and rationality, because he keeps making all these dumb mistakes" (via MR)
  • Zoom and academic freedom -- the firm develops a policy in the wake of outcries over its previous decisions to disallow certain events on its system
  • “Upon his return to America, he recognized the critical importance of getting at the root of racial prejudice and, in his case, how we treat Asian Americans” -- how Dewey's thoughts on bigotry are relevant today
  • “An understanding of Coleridge’s thinking… provides insight into the beginnings of the analytic-Continental divide and a bridge between materialist and dynamic (powers-based) views in the sciences” -- Peter Cheyne (Shimane) on the philosophy of Samuel Taylor Coleridge
  • Radical embodied cognitive science -- a conversation ranging across philosophy and psychology with Richard Brown (CUNY) and Tony Chemero (Cincinnati)
  • “What do accountants know about morality? More than you might think, but not enough” -- Robert Bloomfield (Cornell) sets out "moral accounting" and asks philosophers for feedback
  • “Rogue Philosophers” is a new video series of conversations -- between academic philosopher Jennifer Scuro and philosophical counselor Monica Vilhauer
  • The park in Athens that is home to the site of Plato’s Academy is getting a makeover -- the plan, which includes a new archaeological museum, "fully respects the history of the space and revives the spirit of the Platonic Academy for the simultaneous education of mind and body," says Greece's culture minister
  • “I think imagination can do much more than philosophers often give it credit for” -- an interview with Amy Kind (Claremont McKenna)
  • 29 philosophers agree: enough with the repugnant conclusion already! -- in Utilitas. (Editorial note: ok, but let's stop framing Parfit's problems as *about* population; his "population problems" are no more about population than trolley problems are about trolleys)
  • What should you do as the commenter on a philosophy paper? -- some common and not-so-common options, from Jonathan Ichikawa (UBC)
  • What’s the use of impostor syndrome? -- Stephen Gadsby (Monash) thinks it may be motivating
  • “He is much more than an intellectual, he is an adventurer of ideas” -- “Voltaire in Love” is a new four-episode Franco-Belgian mini-series
  • “Pro-choice advocates have deliberately avoided engaging moral or ethical questions about abortion” -- they shouldn't, argues Nathan Nobis (Morehouse) and Jonathan Dudley (JHU)
  • “All I knew was that it was interesting” -- Stephen Darwall (Yale) interviewed by Connie Rosati (UT Austin) about his life and work in philosophy in PEA Soup's "Mentees Interviewing Mentors" series
  • “A surprisingly underexplored question is whether many people have thoughts” — so they did a study. The good news is “The results were consistent with everyone having thoughts,” but there might be worries about the methodology
  • “Social robots might change the social moral order by changing the metaphors that humans use to understand themselves” -- with the upshot that we will be more likely to think in utilitarian ways, argues John Danaher (NUI)
  • “There is no evidence that… induced change in free will beliefs has any effect on morality, such as antisocial behavior, cheating, conformity, or willingness to punish” -- findings from a meta-analysis of nearly 150 studies with over 26,000 participants
  • The fertile philosophy of mind of William James -- an interview with Alexander Klein (McMaster)
  • Music to my ears: careful distinctions, carefully deployed -- an informative and well-reasoned examination of the analog-digital debate in audio, from Michael Thomas Connolly, a very thoughtful musician and recording engineer
  • Do lessons that encourage students to try out virtues like Confucian filial piety or Lakotan quietness involve objectionable cultural appropriation? -- Jean Kazez (SMU) takes up the question
  • Metaethics and experimental philosophy -- the Cognitive Science of Philosophy at the Brains blog continues with contributions from Pascale Willemsen (Zurich) and Bianca Cepollaro (Vita-Salute San Raffaele)
  • “Where the crowning moment of our identity we hoped to achieve in the pinnacle of success turns out not to be the thing we were looking for after all, and we’re thrown back upon the thinness of our bare self’s existence” -- Mary Townsend (St. John's) reviews "Soul," the recent Pixar movie
  • “His academic year stipend was $15,000 throughout graduate school, yet he finished with about $35,000 in savings” -- an interview (featuring helpful financial tips for graduate students) with philosopher Trevor Hedberg (Ohio State), who completed his PhD in 2017
  • Is consciousness located in the brain’s electromagnetic field? -- the idea of the "conscious electromagnetic information" (cemi) field is a kind of "scientific dualism"
  • “The fall into conspiracy theories is an epistemic form of death-by-a-thousand-cuts. The tragedy is that rationality may not guard against it” -- Kevin Dorst (Pitt) on the surprising rationality of "belief perserverance"
  • Marx, his Africana legacy, and black women Marxists -- a conversation between Vanessa Wills (GW) and Peter Adamson (LMU)

2021 ©Daily Nous
wpDiscuz
1
0
Discussion welcome. Click to comment.x
()
x
| Reply