Acquisitions, Revenue, and Morale Down at Harvard University Press
“Harvard University Press published 142 new titles in the fall of 2016. Last fall, it put out just 26.”
And “revenue from new books — the ‘frontlist’ — declined by half since 2018.”
These figures are from a lengthy investigative report published at The Harvard Crimson about Harvard University Press (HUP).
What explains the drop?
Reporters William C. Mao and Veronica H. Paulus write:
In September 2017, George T. Andreou ’87 became the director of HUP. Since then, press staff alleged — in interviews with The Crimson, union surveys, and letters to Harvard administrators — that he has belittled HUP employees to their peers, instilled a fear of retaliation and layoffs, and mismanaged the publishing house.
That environment has caused an exodus of talent, staff say. Since 2018, at least 50 employees have left the press — and, in interviews and in letters obtained by The Crimson, several cited Andreou’s leadership as a key catalyst for their departures…
“I have never in my professional life in trade publishing experienced the kind of abusive, egotistical and unprofessional behavior that I have seen consistently over the course of the last two and a half years,” a former editor wrote in a 2020 letter to [then-provost Alan] Garber that called for Andreou’s removal.
The reporters note that circa 2020 decline in output “was not unusual among academic presses as the Covid-19 pandemic hit.” Still, “university presses at some peer schools, however, recovered from their pandemic-related dips in output after several months. HUP did not. Instead, its publishing numbers fell precipitously over the next several years,” as you can see on the following graph:

Read The Crimson’s report for further details.
My advice to Harvard: “Carborundum non Ilegitimum” (don’t let the bastard wear you down)
Well. I was going to send them a proposal, but now I won’t. Good to know I shouldn’t be wasting my time and energy in that direction.
I am grateful to HUP for publishing my first (and only) book. I wish them nothing but recovery from this and success. But I did get caught in the first wave of chaos under this new leadership when they froze all contracts including mine (after successful reviews and extensive revisions). While they allowed my contract to move forward in the end, they insisted on a second round of reviewers, entirely new people. I then had 3 weeks to incorporate incredibly extensive feedback on the manuscript. As it happens the feedback was good, and a new editor worked hard to give me excellent line edits when it turned out they wanted a smaller page count at the last minute. But while the book made it through in the end, it was a stressful, irregular, unprofessional process. I’m contrcatually obligated to submit my second book to them. I sure hope they’ve turned around the press by then! I do wish them the best.