Mini-Heap


Recent additions to the Heap…

Discussion welcome.

  1. “There is an important distinction… between what we might think of as free self-censorship—not saying something out of a desire to be civil, considerate, or convincing—and coerced self-censorship—not saying something because one believes one will be punished if one does” — and other nuances regarding free speech on campuses
  2. If philosophical thought experiments were more politically and scientifically realistic — Edward Hall (Sheffield) looks at the ticking time-bomb example used to argue for the permissibility of torture
  3. “Why Twitter is not the best public forum for philosophers to go toe-to-toe with scientists” — a case study: Goff v. Hossenfelder
  4. “‘Being a moral agent is very demanding,’ she said. ‘But then everything is hard. And the cost of not trying is higher’” — a profile of Lea Ypi (LSE) in The New Yorker
  5. Anselm’s ontological argument: a guide for those perplexed by it, and by its resilience — by John Danaher (Galway)
  6. Catch up on this year’s developments in science & math — Quanta’s annual reviews
  7. “Philosophy is both a natural and a strange resource for helping people resolve the problems of life” — The New Yorker looks at philosophical counseling, with a focus on Lydia Amir (Tufts)

Mini-Heap posts usually appear when 7 or so new items accumulate in the Heap of Links, a collection of items from around the web that may be of interest to philosophers.

The Heap of Links consists partly of suggestions from readers; if you find something online that you think would be of interest to the philosophical community, please send it in for consideration for the Heap. Thank you.

 

USI Switzerland Philosophy
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Patrick S. O'Donnell
4 months ago

No. 2 by Edward Hall in Philosophy Now is a nice, accessible summary of some of the better literature on this argument. Nonetheless, untutored intuitions and attempts at counter-arguments persist among the well-educated and those considerably less-educated on this topic. I have a compilation that tries to capture the range of the relevant (morally, legally, and politically speaking) literature: https://www.academia.edu/4844181/Torture_moral_legal_and_political_dimensions_a_basic_bibliography