Mini-Heap
New links…
Discussion welcome.
-
“We must remain open to explanations that do not rely on the human mind as a template” — Raphaël Millière (Macquarie) and Charles Rathkopf (Jülich Research Center) on AI in Vox
-
The ethical, legal, and societal implications of NASA’s Artemis and Moon to Mars missions — Zach Pirtle is on the Small Steps, Giant Leaps podcast
-
“Today, we are meant to make our papers focused and efficient, to make a paper with three ideas into three papers… I want to push back. There’s already too much to read” — Helen De Cruz (SLU) on norms for philosophy papers
-
“A future in which we’re all using AI to complete our work is one in which we are more isolated from each other and the fruits of our labor” — AIs will bring greater efficiency, but who benefits from it, and what are its costs, asks Benjamin Mitchell-Yellin (Sam Houston State)
-
“Philosophy, Bullshit, and Peer Review” — a new, short, open access book from Neil Levy (Oxford) discusses “evidence for the widespread feeling that peer review is broken”
-
“Well, you can’t complain!” — Not only can we, we sometimes should. Kathryn Norlock (Trent) on complaining and its many purposes
-
“I know him the way one knows a small seaside town / after window shopping its main street” — “Recommendation,” the poem, by Keith Leonard (via Jennifer Baker)
Mini-Heap posts usually appear when 7 or so new items accumulate in the Heap of Links, a collection of items from around the web that may be of interest to philosophers.
The Heap of Links consists partly of suggestions from readers; if you find something online that you think would be of interest to the philosophical community, please send it in for consideration for the Heap. Thank you.