Philosophical Input on Transportation Policy


Can philosophers help improve transportation policy? Jonathan Badgley, an economist who works with the US Department of Transportation (US DOT) and who studied philosophy as an undergraduate, thinks so.

[Andreas Gursky, “Bahrain I” (detail)]

He wrote in recently to share that US DOT is looking to the public for help responding to President Biden’s Executive Order On Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government. He writes:

US DOT is currently seeking public comment on methods for identifying valid and reliable aggregate data to help measure equity in order to improve Federal transportation programs. There are 25 specific questions that the agency is seeking public comment on, and while many of these questions relate to issues outside of philosophers’ purview (e.g., data sources, etc.) there are a number of normative-laded questions that I believe are critical for the agency to hear from philosophers on. For instance, here are two questions from the request:

(6) Housing affordability in the United States is measured in terms of percentage of income (i.e., the current threshold is 30 percent of income). Is there a similar threshold for “transportation affordability” currently in use by planning practitioners and planning agencies? What are some methods and strategies that the Department can use for determining and assessing the level of a transportation overburden cost standard?

 (7) How should the Department identify and measure the benefits and drawbacks (e.g., safety, wellbeing, and mobility benefits) of Federal transportation investments to underserved communities? How should the Department identify and measure the social cost of inequity in transportation projects or policies in underserved communities?

Again, the framing of these questions is around data and methods questions, but at heart are issues of what equity means in the transportation context that have not been directly and sufficiently addressed (by transportation folks or by philosophers in publication, at least that I’m aware of).

The request is a great opportunity for philosophers to significantly contribute to a real world issue, the fair and equitable provision of transportation goods, by clarifying these normative concepts of fairness, equity, welfare, etc. in this context. 

You can view all of the questions here and provide a comment by clicking on the green “Submit a Formal Comment” button near the top of the document.

guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shane Epting
3 months ago

My new book, The Morality of Urban Mobility, should be of interest. Report

Kenny Easwaran
Reply to  Shane Epting
3 months ago

Go submit a comment on the US DOT site!Report

Shane Epting
Reply to  Kenny Easwaran
3 months ago

Comments are requested by June 24, 2021.” Too bad it’s not a conference. I could use the extended deadline. Report

Matthew Smith
Reply to  Shane Epting
3 months ago

Everyone read Shane!Report

Shane Epting
Reply to  Matthew Smith
3 months ago

Haha, thanks, Matthew. It has been a while! Hope all is well.Report

Sam Noll
3 months ago

This is a great discussion. If you’re interested in philosophy of transportation, you should check out the special issue on the philosophical dimensions of urban transportation in Essays in Philosophy guest edited by Shane Epting. (https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/journal?openform&journal=pdc_eip)

Also, there’s a lot of work on transportation going on in the Philosophy of the City Research Group, as transportation (and the built environment, more generally) is a key topic, since Walter Benjamin (1892-1940). Check out https://philosophyofthecity.org/philosophy-of-the-city-research-group/. There is also a facebook group and yearly conference. Here is a new publication, as well on the Morality of Urban Mobility…

https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781786608192/The-Morality-of-Urban-Mobility-Technology-and-Philosophy-of-the-City?fbclid=IwAR3WVHcc9ns53wzFfx2P36VXis-jsAMch0QS7pWxhUKn3j1bsUcuRrdbW5YReport

Last edited 3 months ago by Sam Noll
Matthew Smith
3 months ago

My new book The Spatial Contract might be of interest: https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526143372/

Everyone interested should read Shane Epting’s work first, though.Report

Samantha Noll
Reply to  Matthew Smith
3 months ago

This looks great. I’m looking forward to reading your book.Report

Shane Epting
Reply to  Samantha Noll
3 months ago

Same here!Report

Phil Reed
Phil Reed
Reply to  Matthew Smith
3 months ago

Great title!Report