Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

news for & about the philosophy profession

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls: Papers/Events/Grants/etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
Ad Hoc
Home
Daily Nous Features

Ad Hoc

By
Justin Weinberg
. March 2, 2021 at 1:32 pm

Ad Hoc
by Rachel Katler

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info about DN Comics
Rachel Katler on Twitter

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags ad hocDaily Nous Philosophy ComicsRachel Katler
10 likes
Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

Devin on How Risk-Averse is Academic Philosophy?

It has increasingly seemed to me that specialization, even hyper-specialization, isn’t the problem - it’s specialization without collaboration. We’re still attached to the romantic lone […]
Michał Kowalczyk on Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.

REMINDERCALL FOR PAPERSfor a topical issue of Open PhilosophyORDINARY AESTHETICS https://www.degruyter.com/publication/journal_key/OPPHIL/downloadAsset/OPPHIL_CFP%20Ordinary%20Aesthetics.pdf

NnES on How Risk-Averse is Academic Philosophy?

The following idea is highly speculative, but I suspect that an academic culture that disfavors "cautious and modest research agendas" is more likely to promote […]
Richard Y Chappell on How Risk-Averse is Academic Philosophy?

It's hard to confidently generalize, since there's such a broad range of philosophy being done. But I guess it does ring true to me […]
Patrick S. O'Donnell on How Risk-Averse is Academic Philosophy?

Although this is not up to the standards of a professional philosophy journal, I think it nonetheless exemplifies one kind of “global philosophy” (it also […]
Patrick S. O'Donnell on How Risk-Averse is Academic Philosophy?

I am not qualified to offer a well-informed opinion about contemporary academic philosophy if only because I am on the outside looking in. However, from […]
Jason Brennan on How Risk-Averse is Academic Philosophy?

Philosophy might be risk averse, but I know from experience you can publish all of the following in leading places: 1. Democracy sucks 2. You should feel […]
Neil Levy on How Risk-Averse is Academic Philosophy?

I hear this quite a lot. It's common to say that journals accept only the safest papers - i.e., those which mine well developed seams. […]
Sam on Teaching Philosophy in a World with ChatGPT

The question is whether they can be done asynchronously, in a way that preserves integrity!
Naive squirrel on Teaching Philosophy in a World with ChatGPT

Oral exams can be done virtually, I imagine...
Asya Passinsky on Summer 2023 Programs in Philosophy for Graduate Students and/or PhDs

CEU Summer Course on "Contemporary Issues in Ontology and Social Ontology" Dates: July 17–28, 2023 Location: Central European University, Budapest, Hungary (in person) Contact: Mark Balaguer […]
Asya Passinsky on Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.

CEU Summer Course on "Contemporary Issues in Ontology and Social Ontology". Central European University, Budapest, Hungary. July 17–28, 2023. Application deadline: February 14, 2023. https://summeruniversity.ceu.edu/courses/contemporary-issues-ontology-and-social-ontology

Subscribe

Archives

Paid Advertisements
Thinker Analytix
Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

  • The philosophy of comics (comic strips, comic books) -- questions and comments from nine philosophers
  • The do’s and don’ts of writing about women in the history of philosophy -- from Sandrine Bergès (Bilkent)
  • How much time does it take you, typically, to referee a paper (not how long it takes between agreeing to referee and submitting the report; just the actual time spent refereeing)? -- share your responses at the Cocoon
  • “A path to get college credit that begins on a YouTube video” -- does this new collaboration with Arizona State University represent the future of universities, or portend their demise?
  • “His most significant contribution is his argument that everything is ultimately made of water. It has made a big splash” -- a tenure letter for Thales, by Brad Skow (MIT)
  • The Gradient covers a wide range of issues regarding artificial intelligence -- recent articles have concerned AI epistemology, the punishment of robots, and the connection between understanding and making the "right mistakes"
  • “The synthetic creative factor of our knowledge extends… into the very first sense-impressions and even into the elements of logic” -- Friedrich Lange is "interviewed" about his neo-Kantianism, the significance of materialism, and other philosophers, at 3:16AM
  • “Far from being a fusty academic discipline with no relevance to the ‘real’ world, philosophy was, for him, an existential matter of immediate importance” -- the case for a biography of Bryan Magee
  • Voters “should expect that an effective candidate will be imperfectly honest at best” -- but liars like George Santos, who are "unlikely to be believed" are "incapable of achieving those goods that justify their deception" says Michael Blake (Washington)
  • “What does not yet exist is a discipline that treats the workings of government itself as a philosophical subject. This field could be called ‘the philosophy of public administration'” -- Dan Little (UM-Dearborn) on the case for (and questions of) this subfield
  • “Claude’s writing is more verbose, but also more naturalistic. Its ability to write coherently about itself, its limitations, and its goals seem to also allow it to more naturally answer questions on other subjects” -- meet Claude, one of several alternatives to ChatGPT
  • “If A beats B and B beats C, A and C have essentially equal chances of prevailing against each other.” Wait, what? -- all about intransitive dice
  • “What is our universe expanding into?” -- "That’s a great question. The answer, though, is that it’s not a great question," says Paul Sutter (Stony Brook)
  • “The Department of Personal Inspections is charged with the remit of examining the lives of persons within His Majesty’s territories. You have been chosen for inspection, and judgment will be rendered” -- a short story about akrasia, the gaze of the other, and the examined life, by Ben Roth (Tufts)
  • “The exercise of common sense involves a drawing back from unforeseen danger… whereas in philosophy we are more interested in seeking out unforeseen dangers in order to then avoid them” -- a history of what philosophers have thought about "common sense" by Stephen Leach (Keele)
  • “You should always gather more evidence, say women who love gossip” -- Carolina Flores (UC Irvine) and Elise Woodard (MIT) have some fun posting about a forthcoming paper at NWIP
  • “Exaggerations, half-truths and outright lies will dominate our historical imagination and make it impossible to understand, and learn from, the past” -- Daniel Bessner (Washington) on the decline of the historical profession
  • “The algorithmic lens while giving us affordances has a certain number of blind spots… that we must be precise… that more data is better… that there is a single uniform truth to be found…” -- Suresh Venkatasubramanian (Brown) is interviewed about developing the US Government's Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights
  • A philosophy course centered around paradoxes -- taught by Patrick Greenough at St. Andrews
  • “Contemporary analytical philosophy is in greater part interesting, valuable, and well done” -- Crispin Wright (NYU/Stirling) is interviewed about philosophy and his work on objectivity, truth, vagueness, skepticism, and other topics
  • “Like Gandhi, he believed that guarding power was bad for the powerful: segregation harmed the white man’s own soul. But from his other great influence Reinhold Niebuhr… King learned to reject a ‘false optimism'” -- Amod Lele (Boston U.) on MLK's improvement on Gandhi
  • How can we trust science? How does it get at the truth? What about false scientific theories of the past? -- a conversation between Peter Vickers and Jana Bacevic (Durham)
  • “What’s odd about doubling down on population ethics is that it both encourages us to take an unhealthy amount of interest in the quality of lives of other people’s children and that it encourages us to make calculations that are without any solid ground” -- more from Eric Schliesser (Amsterdam) on Will MacAskill and "longtermism"
  • “If we can’t say exactly how we think, then how well do we know ourselves?” -- Have you thought about how you think? Is it in pictures, in patterns, in words, or in some unsymbolized way? The New Yorker's Joshua Rothman thinks about it, with help from philosophers and others
  • How students can use ChatGPT to complete the assignments you give them, and what you can do, including strategies for “leaning in” to the new technology -- a video from Mark Alfano (Macquarie)
  • A petition to have Olympe de Gouges, author of “The Declaration of the Rights of Woman” (1791), memorialized alongside the “great men of France” in the Pantheon -- organized by Sylvia Duverger (Université Paris 8)
  • Simone de Beauvoir wearing a brooch made and given to her by Alexander Calder
  • “To hope well is to be realistic about probabilities, not to succumb to wishful thinking or be cowed by fear; it is to hold possibilities open when you should” -- Kieran Setiya (MIT) on the virtue of hopefulness
  • “Only by assuming a certain constancy between the present and the past can we use the present world as a guide for our historical interpretations… The trick has always been deciding exactly how the present resembles the past” -- Extinct, the philosophy of paleontology blog, is revived---with a new post by its new editor, Max Dresow (Minnesota)
  • “Tell me just what sort of things are the colors you see / if you’re thinking ontologically…” -- Daniel Groll (Carleton) composed a jingle for a course on color taught by his colleagues

∙   2023 © Daily Nous   ∙