Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
Ad Hoc
Home
Daily Nous Features

Ad Hoc

By
Justin Weinberg
. March 2, 2021 at 1:32 pm

Ad Hoc
by Rachel Katler

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info about DN Comics
Rachel Katler on Twitter

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags ad hocDaily Nous Philosophy ComicsRachel Katler
10 likes
Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

Recent UK PhD Grad on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

The solution to large backlogs is stopping submissions until the backlog goes down. Not wasting people's time with peer review. Also I've never been told […]
David Wallace on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

"Even in print journals, just put it in the next issue, whats the big deal? There’s no limit on the number issues a journal can […]
ehz on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

I have no editorial experience but I imagine that journals may reasonably want to limit the number of papers they publish in a given time
Recent UK PhD Grad on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

The comments defending the editor and general status quo of peer review are hilarious. The earnestness of the defence i think belies people's real view […]
David Wallace on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

Stories from some while ago, I should clarify - arxiv.org has basically made it impossible.
Chris on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

Isn't that, in fact, where most of us publish?
David Wallace on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

The short answer is that physics doesn't really use double-blind review. I'm not sure I've seen an explicit defense of that decision (use of something […]
David Wallace on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

I won't name names, obviously, but I've heard very occasional stories of it from sources I deem reliable. (In physics, not in philosophy.)
david on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

Wow. The notion of a referee stealing ideas from a paper under his/her review is pretty high on the corruption scale. Have we
Thomas Nadelhoffer on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

Yes, that would be helpful--especially if the data are going to be used in the way it has been used in this thread.
Thomas Nadelhoffer on Rejection After Positive Referee Reports

Rob, That paper is amazing! I am glad you sent it to Mind. Those sorts of prestigious journals rarely publish work on the philosophy of disability.
Hille Paakkunainen on Philosophy Grad Programs and the GRE, 2021-22 Application Cycle

The Syracuse Philosophy Department will no longer require GRE scores, nor will we consider them even if submitted. This policy will continue until further notice.

Subscribe

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

  • “That comedy is an important social safety valve and sometimes an epistemically useful window in a democracy also entails that it may be socially dangerous” -- Eric Schliesser (Amsterdam) on Chappelle, Srinivasan, Letterman, Trump, Aristophanes, and Socrates
  • “To compromise on the detail is to change the subject” -- an enjoyable and informative essay by Emmanuel Ordóñez Angulo (Oxford) on the challenges to and varieties of popularization in philosophy and mathematics
  • Speaker series on the nature of belief -- from the Concepts & Cognition Lab, hosted by Tania Lombrozo (Princeton) and Neil Van Leeuwen (Georgia State)
  • New publication by John Locke -- "the discovered manuscript provides the first evidence of Locke's commitment to the principle that minimalistic theism would suffice for peaceable coexistence in any civil society"
  • Reconceiving abortion as a public good -- so that the state has a compelling interest in people having access to it
  • “The position that I have in philosophy—I grew up poor, I am a Black woman, et cetera—means I have… very different evidence of what the stuff of anger actually looks like” -- Myisha Cherry (UC Riverside) interviewed in The New Yorker about anger and philosophy
  • What are and what should be the limits on scientific freedom? -- Heather Douglas (Michigan State) talks with Maria Kronfeldner (CEU) as part of a series on socially engaged philosophy
  • “The political/ideological takeover is the practice of using political positions to drive our philosophy (or drive out the rest of philosophy), rather than the other way around” -- an interview with Michael Huemer (Colorado) at What Is It Like To Be A Philosopher
  • Moral progress and moral methodology -- a conversation between Philip Kitcher (Columbia) and Julia Hermann (Utrecht) (scroll to the end for the link to the video)
  • “There is nothing in the nature of academic research that guarantees that ‘the best ideas of a generation will become part of the canon for the next generation’; instead, many good and original ideas have been lost to the disciplines through bad luck” -- consider, for example, the case of Ludwik Fleck
  • “There can be a lot of natural values, all equally valuable and natural, but different ones need different circumstances or social settings to be realized—so they will occur or flower at different times/places” -- an interview with Rachel Zuckert (Northwestern), who pays attention to "real tensions real facts about art and our appreciation of it"
  • “The life I lived, inside the walls of the house and outside, was in fact not one life but two, lives that sometimes complemented and supported each other, but mostly clashed against a reality I could not fully grasp” -- a profile of political philosophy Lea Ypi (LSE)
  • “Never call yourself a philosopher — let others do that” -- Spencer Case's appreciation of philosopher Bill McCurdy
  • “To ask only questions we can answer is a failure of imagination” -- a brief appreciation of philosophy from Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside)
  • “Imagining is not an alternative to reality and rationality or a diminished form of it. Imagining is a complementary form in our ways of knowing” -- Luca Tateo (Oslo) on a unified theory of imagining
  • The mathematics of heaps “looks like a living process” -- not about philosophy but this is the "heap" of links so file this under self-understanding
  • There will be a virtual memorial for Charles Mills on Sunday October 10, 2021, from 2pm to 5pm, EDT -- details are on the new Charles Mills memorial website
  • Audio of philosophy of science lectures from Voice of America’s “Forum: The Arts & Sciences in Mid-Century America” (1963) -- the series includes Quine, Hempel, Goodman, Black, Nagel, Putnam, Levi, Morgenbesser, Feyerabend, Suppes, and others (via Boaz Miller)
  • “What are memoirists doing exactly, when we claim to ‘find’ this form and meaning in our past experience? Are we genuinely discovering it back there or just making it up?” -- Helena de Bres (Wellesley) on the philosophy of memoirs
  • “My model of the world is that there are many, many, many thinkers, ideas and texts that are sufficiently interesting to merit serious consideration” -- why Liam Kofi Bright (LSE) opposes philosophical canons
  • “In sex of all things, where humans so often misconstrue what other humans want… can we ever trust ourselves to know, really know, what an animal wants?” -- Amia Srinivasan (Oxford) takes an unflinching look at bestiality
  • In Memo Akten’s ‘Learning To See’, “an artificial neural network loosely inspired by our own visual cortex, looks through cameras and tries to make sense of what it sees” -- "Of course it can only see what it already knows. Just like us."
  • “It is morally imperative to not say true things on social media” -- Justin E. H. Smith on the "false representative class" today's technology has spawned
  • “The visual image can no longer compete. Video is dead. Videogames seek to evolve into—or devolve back into—text-based games, so far with little success” -- a fascinating short story from philosopher John Holbo (NUS) about a world in which how people read has radically changed
  • “I sometimes wonder whether it’s news to most philosophers that ‘A = A’ can be funny and even is the structure, or the form, of the perfect joke” -- a philosopher's appreciation of comedian Norm McDonald, who died in September
  • It’s likely we’ll find that “being conscious, much like being alive, has many different properties that will express in different ways… among different species, among different systems” -- and so, says neuroscientist Anil Seth, "the mystery of consciousness may dissolve"
  • “One reason most humanities professors wouldn’t consider themselves humanists: they’re too busy pretending to be scientists” -- by looking at the ideas of Charles Babbitt, we can see reasons to "jumpstart an omni-cultural humanist revival"
  • A Facebook group for faculty and graduate students in philosophy who were first-generation college students -- created by Georgi Gardiner (Tennessee)
  • “Our knowledge of ourselves is (meta)knowledge like any other – hard-won, and always subject to revision” -- Stephen M. Fleming (UCL) on the science of metacognition
  • “We don’t even claim that it is rehabilitative, although it might be, but we do claim that it takes people seriously” -- an article about philosophy in prisons, based on discussions with MM McCabe and Mike Coxhead (KCL)

∙   2021 ©Daily Nous   ∙