How does Wikipedia “see” philosophy?
According to one visualization that was made to show how “philosophers don’t think in isolation” but rather “draw from their peers’ work to make their own contribution, creating a web of ideas,” here’s how:
That doesn’t tell us much, but each of those blue dots is a philosopher, and you can click on any of them to see to whom else they’re connected in Wikipedia, and to see a preview of their Wikipedia page. For example:
If you make use of the “clip to timeline” feature, the visualization shows the philosophers’ position in history. The gold dot is Descartes:
Zooming in allows you to see the lines of influence more clearly, with green lines connecting the selected philosopher to those who influenced him and gold lines connecting the selected philosopher to those on whom they’ve had a strong influence:
You can also search for names, with results indicated on the visualization with red dots.
This visualization carries quite some bias. The bias of looking only at the English Wikipedia, the bias of looking only at philosophers with nicely scrapable bios, the bias of the algorithm and hyperparameters used for calculating centrality scores and lastly the noise added by my erratic Python programming. If you still want to use it to draw conclusions like “Plato is #1 I knew it!!”, go ahead.
You can learn more about how they put together the project here.
Try it out below or, perhaps a little more easily, here.
P.S. In case you didn’t know, clicking on the first (non-parenthesized, non-italicized) link in the main text of nearly any Wikipedia article, and then repeating the process for subsequent articles, usually will eventually bring you to Wikipedia’s main Philosophy article. (Wikipedia has its own page about this.)