Mini-Heap
Here is the latest edition of Mini-Heap: 10 recent items of interest to philosophers (and others interested in philosophy) from the Daily Nous Heap of Links.
(The Heap of Links consists partly of suggestions from readers; if you find something online that you think would be of interest to the philosophical community, please send it in for consideration for the Heap.)
- “Peterson offers no effective antidote to the problem of the toxic masculine despair he reinforces and dignifies, having misrepresented it as a general and hence presumably equal opportunity crisis of Being.” — Kate Manne (Cornell) reviews Jordan Peterson’s “12 Rules”
- “A complete 100-percent-provable guarantee” that self-driving cars won’t crash into trees, traffic, etc. — based on a problem posed in 1900 by David Hilbert called “sum of squares”
- “People often say that philosophy has a lot to offer, and I think it’s true. But it has a lot to offer only if it’s participating alongside other people who have a lot to offer; listening as much as talking” — an interview with Julian Baggini at Epoché
- A single page of Marx’s draft of Capital sells for over $500,000 — buyer rumored to be Fulvia Morgana
- The beginnings of a movement to stop relying on student evaluations of teaching — and replace them with peer observation and more holistic teaching evaluation systems
- “It’s pretty embarrassing to our profession that students can read, say, 500 or even 1,000 pages of material and come away thinking that the first time a woman had anything to say of any importance in philosophy was in 1970” — an interview with Andrew Janiak (Duke)
- Philosophy journal data analyzed, with attention to differences between information from author surveys and the journals themselves — by Jonathan Weisberg (Toronto)
- “That which escapes the sciences lies at the heart of the humanities, and the reverse is also true… they’re not rivals” — OUP’s Peter Ohlin interviews NYU’s Richard Foley on the subject of academic research
- “One of the norms governing ordinary conversation is that to disagree too much is to be disagreeable” — but what if “disagree” was pretty much your job description (ahem, philosophers)? Jonny Thakkar’s paean to pains in the arse
- How can A be convicted of murdering B when B was killed not by A but by C, and C’s killing of B was found to be justified, i.e., not a murder? — Zachary Hoskins on an unjust prosecution and sentencing
Subscribe
Login
0 Comments