Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls: Papers/Events/Grants/etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
To φ Or Not To φ (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)
Home
Daily Nous Features

To φ Or Not To φ (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)

By
Justin Weinberg
. February 21, 2018 at 11:51 am 0

To φ Or Not To φ
by Tanya Kostochka

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info About DN Comics / Tanya Kostochka on Twitter

Daily Nous Philosophy Comics footer - Kostochka

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags Daily Nous Philosophy Comicsgrade grubbingTanya KostochkaTo φ Or Not To φ
14 likes
Login
guest
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

Ulrich Schimmack on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

Automatic does not equal without awareness. You seem to define implicit as automatic but wecan just say association. Some thought come to mind more readily.
Ulrich Schimmack on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

Agreed
Ulrich Schimmack on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

Respondents are aware that they have these associations. So it is still not clear that the reaction times are driven by implicit processes. This is
Ulrich Schimmack on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

Ulrich Schimmack here. My results show that there is some small amount of valid variance in race IAT scores but this variance is highly correlated with […]
Ulrich Schimmack on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

There are racist who are not in denial or bow to woke political correctness. They report pro White attitudes. After correcting for measurement error these
Lee Jussim on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

Justin, even I am convinced that there is *some* nonzero correlation between IAT scores and discrimination-like behavior. Even the skeptics (such as Tetlock) […]
Chandra Sripada on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

"we could presumably check whether there is a *correlation* at all between choosing coffee over tea on a certain day and being patriotic on that […]
Lee Jussim on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

Chandra, ok, let's start where we agree. Do people have associations between concepts in memory? Of course. Can these involve stereotypes and prejudice? […]
David Owen on New: Journal of Social and Political Philosophy

I do hope that the people commenting have read the first issue or at least all the abstracts . (Declaration of interest: I am in
Justin Kalef on Implicit Attitudes, Science, and Philosophy (guest post)

Sorry if I'm missing something here, Chandra. But let me try to put what I'm saying more succinctly to see whether that gets us anywhere. You […]
David Owen on New: Journal of Social and Political Philosophy

This doesn't speak to your point, but it does contextualise Kant's essay.
David Owen on New: Journal of Social and Political Philosophy

Note Frederick’s statement in the same year as Kants essay that a ‘private person has no right to pass public and perhaps even disapproving judgement […]

Subscribe

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

  • “If we want to get at ‘metaphysical structure’ we need to say something about what kind of thing that could be and how it relates to the logic of truths, and this has to go beyond just appealing to naturalism” -- Paul Livingston (New Mexico) interviewed at 3:16AM
  • Psychedelic drugs, epistemology, naturalism, and the self -- a special issue of Philosophy and the Mind Sciences includes several philosophers commenting on Philosophy of Psychedelics by Chris Letheby (Western Australia)
  • “The current generation of Anglo-American philosophers never had enough invested in the aesthetic to fully grasp what is at risk of being lost when the aesthetic is subordinated to the political” -- Justin E. H. Smith on politics, culture, art, and philosophy
  • “There is simply nothing like this remarkable book for making us think carefully about what makes a story work well” -- Philip Freeman (Pepperdine) on the wisdom in Aristotle's Poetics
  • “To teach this active reading attitude of not believing everything you read, I borrow the pedagogical strategy of deliberately inserting errors which the student must detect” -- Gwern Branwen on the "fake journal club" (via The Browser)
  • “I think it’s a great argument that I’m not convinced of…” -- Kate Greasley (Oxford) discusses the complicated ethics of abortion on the Ezra Klein Show
  • “Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t think they should have a lever that allows any old idiot to divert the whole group of us to Westport on a whim” -- the trolley is reviewed
  • New: IPM Monthly – Medieval Philosophy Today -- a site for news, opportunities, publication notices, profiles of philosophers, etc., related to medieval philosophy
  • “What I loved about the history of jazz—namely, that subtle changes to chord sequences and key changes could reframe the entire realm of possibilities for musicians in the future—was also a feature of the history of philosophy” -- philosopher Andrea Pitts (UNC Charlotte) is interviewed about their life and work in philosophy, with a particular focus on social identities
  • What is the value of studying moral dilemmas? -- an exchange between Paul Conway (Portsmouth) and Guy Kahane (Oxford)
  • “A great deal of harm is being done in the modern world by the belief in the virtuousness of work” -- Bertrand Russell on the value of leisure and its "wise use," in a 1932 issue of Harper's (via The Browser)
  • “If spectacular forms of white supremacy were to end tomorrow, whiteness as a structure of privilege, power and hegemony would continue” -- George Yancy (Emory) on how "white-perpetrated, anti-Black murder is all too acceptable, consistent and inoffensive to the very fabric of this nation"
  • “Passing is not without costs: it takes a significant emotional and psychological toll, both on individuals who pass and on the friends and family they may leave behind” -- Meena Krishnamurthy (Queen's) on the "burdened virtue" of racial passing
  • A missing color -- cognitive scientist and artist Allen Tager tries to figure out what explains why violet was largely missing for much of human history
  • Philosophy at the movies -- some highlights from the film & philosophy podcast of Justin Khoo (MIT), "Cows in the Field"
  • “The objection to violence has its limit at the point when fundamental freedoms are at stake” -- understanding Habermas' view on Germany's role in helping Ukraine (via Darrel Moellendorf)
  • “Raz’s legacy is a body of work united by dense and detailed tissues of understanding, spun between jurisprudence, political philosophy, ethics, and practical reasoning” -- Jeremy Waldron (NYU) on the significance of Joseph Raz's work
  • If we conceive of time as a kind of veil of ignorance, perhaps the governance of space is a good subject for a Rawlsian approach—but not for long -- more cynical headline: "Rawls's Theory Finally Finds Suitable Application in Lifeless Void, according to Social Scientists"
  • More on the metaphysics of farts, and the mysterious author of the article smelt round the world -- by Elizabeth Picciuto in Slate
  • “How much should we dress up for an event when the topic of the talk was body modification?” -- a journalist reports on an event with philosopher Clare Chambers (Cambridge) about bodies, beauty, and shame
  • “Faddish calls to… ‘center the most marginalized,’ which abound in the academic and leftist activist circles… ‘never sat well with me'” -- a profile of Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò (Georgetown) in New York Magazine
  • “If any woman could realize Sartre’s picture of self-defining ‘man,’ Iris might have fancied her chances” -- When Iris Murdoch met Jean-Paul Sartre
  • “For better or worse, most contemporary philosophers must engage either directly or indirectly with racist philosophers” -- Brandon Hogan (Howard) on how to do it better
  • How to participate in a philosophical discussion -- a guide for students by Olivia Bailey (Berkeley)
  • The television show that introduced existentialism to to Americans -- the 10-episode series, "Self-Encounter," aired in 1961 and was hosted by Hazel Barnes
  • “All of this applying takes an incalculable toll… Maybe we need to imagine whole new worlds where people-picking happens very differently” -- Adam Mastroianni (Columbia) on the costs of, and alternatives to, all the applying for everything we all do (via The Browser)
  • Some people think that humans matter more than non-human animals because of what we can do, or what we’re like -- but, argues Jeff Sebo (NYU) this "human exceptionalism has it backwards: if anything, we increasingly have capacities-based and relationship-based grounds for prioritising nonhuman animals"
  • “For any hypothetical future apply the ‘Shakespeare Test,’ which asks: Are there still aspects of Shakespeare’s work reflected in the future civilization?… For do any of us want to live in a world where Shakespeare is obsolete?” -- Erik Hoel on why it's important that the future be human
  • “It really is unfair to a great number of people, past, present, and future, that current student debt holders would benefit from loan forgiveness while others cannot” -- but that by itself doesn't settle the matter, says Barry Lam (Vassar), because "almost every policy is unfair"
  • “There is a kind of covert moralism that people build into the causal structure of the universe that justifies overly focusing on being the right kind of person, objecting to the right kinds of things, centering the right sorts of people. This amounts to a refusal to look forward” -- Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò (Georgetown) is interviewed about his two recent books

∙   2021 ©Daily Nous   ∙

wpDiscuz
0
0
Discussion welcome. Click to comment.x
()
x
| Reply