Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
To φ Or Not To φ (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)
Home
Daily Nous Features

To φ Or Not To φ (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)

By
Justin Weinberg
. November 28, 2017 at 12:35 pm 0

To φ Or Not To φ
by Tanya Kostochka

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info About DN Comics / Tanya Kostochka on Twitter

Daily Nous Philosophy Comics footer - Kostochka

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags Daily Nous Philosophy ComicsTanya KostochkaTo φ Or Not To φ
7 likes
Login
guest
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paid Advertisements
How To Do Thing with Emotions by Owen Flanagan
Philosophy at Cincinnati

Recent Comments

Jen on Philosophers On Space Exploration

I'm not sure we should assume that their range of choices will be vastly different from that of most people today. Like people today, they'll […]
Sara Purinton on Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.

CFA: MAP-Penn Conference on Philosophy of Illness and Disability MAP-Penn is soliciting anonymized abstracts of 500-750 words on any aspect of Philosophy of Disability and/or Philosophy […]
THOMAS HUNSCHER on Philosophers On Space Exploration

Reaching almost any other habitable place will likely take generations of humans living and dying on board the spacecraft. The first generation can and probably […]
Sebastian Sweetsugars on Philosophers On How the Pandemic Has Changed Us

I am sympathetic to Yolonda Wilson's piece. Like her, I had also seen that 2020 tweet that said: "If you don’t come out of this […]
Minh Nguyen on Sanders Foundation Announces New "Philosophy in the Media" Fellows

Congratulations to all the fellows. They all are impressive and many are indeed prestigious. I want to thank both the Marc Sanders Foundation and the […]
Jen on In Defense of the Details (guest post)

It's not what I believe (as I'm not sure what to believe), so I'm not sure what people believe the causal connection to be. (For […]
Qiu Lin on Qiu Lin Wins 2021 Aristotle Prize

Of course, I’d love to. I will get back to you with the revised draft when I get home. Happy Thanksgiving!
V. Alan White on In Defense of the Details (guest post)

A small detail of my own if Justin will allow: most of my comments over the years here have been with simply "Alan White"--and […]
Average Joe on In Defense of the Details (guest post)

Jen, I've definitely witnessed both the reverence for brilliance and the scandalous underrepresentation of non-white, non-males, and disadvantaged in the profession. So I don't doubt […]
Jonathan Surovell on Mini-Heap

Thanks, these are interesting issues. I’ll try to address each one quickly, then I’ll have to bow out and go cook. A general comment: to the […]
Alan White on In Defense of the Details (guest post)

I'm convinced Gary Gutting worked hard trying to find a reviewer for TAPTOE. But what puzzles me more than his failure there is the failure […]
Jeff Herman on New: Journal of Spinoza Studies

Very exciting.

Subscribe

Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
SJP Workshop 2022
Paid Advertisements
How To Do Thing with Emotions by Owen Flanagan
Philosophy at Cincinnati

Heap of Links

  • “Ten Propositions of Baruch Spinoza for Tenor and Piano” by British composer Michael Zev Gordon has been shortlisted for an Ivors award -- you can listen to the 21-minute song cycle sets of texts from Spinoza’s Ethics at the link
  • “That various things are simultaneously imaginable and unimaginable is essential to love, our sense of self, and our sense of what is real” -- Oded Na’aman (Stanford) on evils, attachment, ambivalence, and the problems with Stoicism
  • “Human beings are ‘general-purpose culture machines’ capable of creating cultural and moral innovations that permit them to live better and more harmoniously together” -- Dan Little (UM-Dearborn) on existentialism for individuals and historicism for human nature
  • “Stock is quick to point out that she does not believe all trans women are bad” yet “at nearly every instance in the book when trans women are mentioned as agents… they are deceivers, rapists, and violent offenders” -- Adam Briggle (North Texas) agrees with Kathleen Stock on "many of her conceptual points," but, he says, its her "foreboding mood" that drives her arguments
  • “Like everyone else, Benatar finds his views disturbing” -- a profile of David Benatar by Joshua Rothman in The New Yorker
  • “Every time I sit down to write an article or do some other research-related task… I have to ask myself: should I be doing this or should I be spending the time with my children?” -- John Danaher (NUI) on the "academic parent's dilemma"
  • “Philosophical insight arises only from the struggle to cancel this situation of unfreedom and to make the world one’s own in one’s ideas and thought” -- Richard Marshall interviews G.W.F. Hegel at 3:16AM
  • “We need the burgeoning philosophical field of space ethics to help us tackle the thorny moral questions and complicated debates that growing interest in space exploration raises” -- so argues Chelsea Haramia (Spring Hill) at Noema (via Nathan Nobis)
  • “If the analysis that I have provided is correct, then Americans cannot solve the race problem. The most that they can do is choose which race problem they are willing to live with” -- Joseph Heath (Toronto) on how, when it comes to race in the U.S., "different parties define both the problem itself and its solution differently"
  • “When everything that can be explained has been explained, when we know the truths of physics and brains and psychology and social interactions and so on and so forth, will there still be anything worth wondering about?” -- Charlie Huenemann (Utah State) on "the biggest question"
  • “It would have been easy to demand freedom and protection for both Stock and for the trans and non-binary students or allies, since both sides claim to be being intimidated and silenced by the other. But the letter did not do this” -- a nonbinary philosopher on "how I experienced the unfolding of events leading up to and around the recent UK philosophers’ open letter regarding Kathleen Stock"
  • “An insider’s take on three different directions it seems to me the left wing of the applied turn is taking in philosophy” -- Liam Kofi Bright (LSE) offers three "ideal types"
  • A philosophy professor’s account of the “perilous” and “unrelenting” trajectory of his university -- David Benatar's new book is "The Fall of the University of Cape Town"
  • Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason -- condensed into 100 tweets, by Helen de Cruz (SLU)
  • “I conjecture that, in retrospect, historians will come to view Anglophone philosophy from the 1960s to 1990s one of the great golden ages” -- why Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside) thinks "Back in the 1990s, when I was a graduate student, giants strode the Earth! Now, Earth is rather more populated with human-sized people."
  • “There’s definitely been a shift from more traditional abstract philosophical work earlier in my career, to more feminist and political work more recently… Honestly a lot of it was just a matter of paying more attention” -- Jonathan Ichikawa (UBC) is interviewed about his life and work
  • “Terrorism involves the intentional harming of non-combatants…, is committed for ideological reasons and/or political ends,” and often includes “the intrusion of fear into everyday life” -- "the US drone campaign meets these criteria, argues Jessica Wolfendale (Marquette)
  • “What are the most important questions mainstream philosophy ignores or has forgotten about today?” -- 10 philosophers give their answers
  • “I never saw autism as something that applied to me—that is, until I started reading first-person descriptions by autistics, in particular, autistic women, of their own experiences as autistics in a neurotypical world” -- Amandine Catala (UQAM) interviewed about her research and her life as a late-diagnosed autistic woman in philosophy
  • “The past can be a source of information on moves that are missed in present professional discussions” -- and so "historians of philosophy are a collective good to the profession that it pays to have a large enough pool to have around," writes Eric Schliesser (Amsterdam)
  • “Philosophy, the survey seems to imply, consists of a set of clear questions whose answers can usually be bundled into two or three options” -- but "a lot of the philosophical work that I find most meaningful doesn’t take this form. Instead, it challenges the questions themselves," says David Egan (Outer Coast)
  • Next time someone asks why we should bother studying the history of philosophy -- direct them to this thread
  • “Pupils should be encouraged to contribute more than ‘yes, Socrates; certainly, Socrates’ most of the time” -- a gov't report on The Academy, from a collection of "polite emails to the ancients" from "a very firmly 2021 standpoint"
  • A philosopher’s statement of synthesis -- the tracks on a new album of instrumental music from Dale Dorsey (Kansas) unfold in developing patterns that make the perfect soundtrack for your night drive on the electronic highway from here to 1980 (title track is esp. good)
  • “Every female PhD student is sleeping with her supervisor, don’t be naive, it is well known. They all do.” -- being told this during a job interview was just one of many incidents of sexism philosopher Juliette Ferry-Danini has faced (from 2020 / via Andrew Mills)
  • “The cleverest people are not those speaking loudest or trying to impress. They are generous instead.” -- Stephen Mumford (Durham) on good philosophical discussion
  • The University of Austin is premised on misrepresentations about what happens in college classrooms and the state of higher education in the U.S. -- commentary from Aaron Hanlon (Colby College)
  • Analytic philosophy generator -- by Andrew M. Bailey (Yale-NUS) (via the Australasian Association of Philosophy)
  • A closer look at Kathleen Stock’s departure from Sussex
  • and Peter Boghossian’s from Portland State -- at Liberal Currents

∙   2021 ©Daily Nous   ∙

wpDiscuz
0
0
Discussion welcome. Click to comment.x
()
x
| Reply