Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls: Papers/Events/Grants/etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
Mind Chunks (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)
Home
Daily Nous Features

Mind Chunks (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)

By
Justin Weinberg
. July 25, 2017 at 12:53 pm 0

Mind Chunks
by Pete Mandik

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info About DN Comics / Pete Mandik on Twitter

 

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags Daily Nous Philosophy ComicsMind ChunksPete Mandik
6 likes
Login
guest
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paid Advertisements
Boston Review Philosophy Today

Recent Comments

Samuel Cantor on Philosophy's Most Beautiful Sentence or Paragraph

63. I have used a myth to kill a myth -- the Myth of the Given. But is my myth really a myth? Or does […]
Dean Zimmerman on 2022 Sanders Metaphysics Prize Awarded

It's true that the Sanders essay prizes for early career scholars, like this Metaphysics prize, are not primarily designed to further the goals you mentioned; […]
Pedro on Philosophy's Most Beautiful Sentence or Paragraph

Quine was wrong about most of what he said, but he was also an undeniably good writter.
Peter Suber on Philosophy Teaching & Learning Materials on Professors' Websites

I retired from teaching philosophy in 2003. But as I taught and re-taught my courses I put my syllabi and handouts online and made them
JTD on Teaching and Writing About Abortion in Idaho (and elsewhere?)

Another point is that serious right wing attacks on academic freedom (such as this one) are pretty rare or non-existent in the UK, Western Europe, […]
Jordan Gogny on Philosophy's Most Beautiful Sentence or Paragraph

“Our total reality and total existence are beautiful and meaningful . . . . We should judge reality by the little which we truly know […]
Heather Douglas on Change Their Minds, Win Money

I argue here that Future Fund is asking the wrong questions. Of course, that is a typical thing for a philosopher to do!
cadakinc on Going To Grad School Despite the Odds

Holy shit where do you work that you get 80k as a philosophy grad student?
Erin on Philosophy's Most Beautiful Sentence or Paragraph

I'm an externalist about meaning, and so your question is invalid
Prof L on Philosophy's Most Beautiful Sentence or Paragraph

Parts of Plato are breathtaking, but nothing matches this passage from Augustine's Confessions: "Sero te amavi, pulchritudo tam antiqua et tam nova, sero te amavi! et ecce […]
Christopher on Going To Grad School Despite the Odds

My undergrad professors definitely made it clear that the odds of getting a job were low, so i knew that going in. And I knew […]
dmf on Mini-Heap

Haack vs incentives https://againstprofphil.org/2022/09/25/a-guest-essay-by-susan-haack-universities-research-imperative-paying-the-price-for-perverse-incentives

Subscribe

Archives

  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
Paid Advertisements
Boston Review Philosophy Today

Heap of Links

  • “Sexual violence is ubiquitous, and for many women it feels like the defining condition and the deepest reality of their lives. But that feeling, like all appeals to personal experience, can obscure as much as it reveals” -- Amia Srinivasan (Oxford) on Andrea Dworkin
  • “Rorty insisted that philosophy is no longer relevant to politics… That is fortunate, because his philosophical position… was exceptionally implausible” -- Thomas Nagel (NYU) on Richard Rorty and America
  • Does language shape the content of epistemology? -- Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) talks about how variations in epistemic expressions across cultures are philosophically significant
  • The laws of nature, time, quantum mechanics, strong determinism, vagueness, and more -- an interview with Eddy Keming Chen (UCSD) at 3:16AM
  • “To understand the world more objectively or impartially, we must adopt more perspectives on it. And so it turns out that empathy makes us less, not more, biased” -- Heidi L. Maibom (U. of the Basque Country, U. of Cincinnati) kicks off a symposium at Brains on her new book, "The Space Between: How Empathy Really Works"
  • An upcoming video game is about Arthur Schopenhauer as a student “seeking prohibited knowledge” -- developed by Toby Svoboda, "The Life of Arthur" will be released next week
  • “Analytic philosophy, even at its most technical, is one way of tackling those fundamental tasks [of securing grounding and direction in life], and as such serves the same emotional needs that non-philosophers reveal to us during our classes, at parties and in hair salons, planes and Ubers” -- Helena de Bres (Wellesley) wraps up her series on analytic philosophy and the meaning of life
  • “We laugh at ‘something mechanical encrusted on the living’” -- Emily Herring (Ghent) on Bergson's philosophy of laughter
  • “There seems to be nothing that in principle cannot be taught in a college classroom provided its relevance to the course” -- Carlo DaVia (Fordham) has produced a guide to help professors untangle and address different potential moral problems related to teaching and classroom speech
  • “The puzzle of addiction: why do people keep using drugs, given that costs outweigh benefits?… Costs and benefits can only be weighed relative to a set of values [so] whose values determine when drug use becomes addiction?” -- Hanna Pickard (JHU) is interviewed about how to understand addiction
  • “Just 20% of PhD-granting institutions in the United States supplied 80% of tenure-track faculty members to institutions across the country between 2011 and 2020,” according to a new study -- and "depending on the field, only 5–23% of faculty members worked at an institution more prestigious than the one at which they earned their PhD"
  • “I am an American Philosopher” is a series of interviews (15, so far) with philosophers published by the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy -- here's one with Eric Mullis (Queens University of Charlotte), who brings together dance and philosophy
  • “I’ve always thought I was better at helping other people think through their ideas than I was at generating new or ground-breaking things of my own. I used to be ashamed of that, but now that I’ve got students of my own, it’s one of my favourite skills to use” -- Audrey Yap (Victoria) is interviewed at What Is It Like To Be A Philosopher?
  • “Too often, well-intentioned calls to ‘diversify the profession’ of academia seem to be motivated by brute desires for demographic representation…. That intelligence comes in many forms suggests a better rationale” -- Devin Sanchez Curry (West Virginia) on appreciating "Grandma's metaphysics"
  • Princeton has so big an endowment that it could, from now on, let in every student for free and still have at least $1.9 billion left over each year -- So why don't they? The author raises this question, but doesn't really try to answer it, and so doesn't seem to realize what's to be learned from it (via The Browser)
  • “The Mystery of Consciousness,” a live public philosophy discussion, took place this past summer in Liverpool -- featuring Philip Goff, Laura Gow, Anil Seth, Jack Symes, Rowan Williams, and a string quartet
  • “Gareth paced up and down and told me he was worrying about me a lot. I had to realise, he said, that I was extremely stupid and would need to work very hard to get any kind of degree. I wasn’t in the least offended” -- Lincoln Allison (Warwick) remembers Gareth Evans, who "made intellectual activity exhilarating"
  • When (and why) are some things best left to the imagination? -- Jennifer Church (Vassar) considers the question
  • “Young Plato,” a documentary about a headteacher in Belfast who brings philosophy into the teaching at his elementary school, will be screened in the United States -- it's "a very engaging film" according to The Guardian
  • “There has not been time to come up with the nuances on how [AI art generators] should be used, and large numbers of very different stakeholders have suddenly shown up at the artists’ door, kicking it in” -- Anders Sandberg (Oxford) on some of the issues AI art raises in moral, social, and political philosophy
  • “When a philosopher has misgivings about the value of philosophy, they’re not just asking ‘why,’ but ‘why why?,’ which is fancier” -- Helena de Bres (Wellesley) recovers her gratitude for philosophy
  • The Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (SERRC) launches a monthly podcast called “Knowledge for Breakfast” -- hosted by Fabien Medvecky (Otago) & Michiel van Oudheusden (KU Leuven), the first episode is on "Epistemic Shame and Imposter Syndrome"
  • You feel attraction to someone? Which of the 12,228 possible versions of this feeling? -- Maria Heim (Amherst) on how India’s "sophisticated traditions of philosophical reflection" explore "the nuances of felt experience with fine-grained particularity"
  • On “private and public sector jobs in a burgeoning ontological sector, involving the commercial and industrial applications of ontology across diverse industries” -- an interview with Barry Smith (Buffalo)
  • Philosophers on the tools of neuroscientific experimentation -- a discussion with contributions from Ann-Sophie Barwich, John Bickle, Dan Burnston, Carl Craver, and Valerie Hardcastle
  • “What is the main impediment to offline creativity? In short, not allowing one’s mind to be offline—rarely choosing, or having the chance, to be alone with one’s thoughts, and to let one’s mind wander” -- Peter Carruthers (Maryland) on a contemporary threat to creativity
  • “Schelling’s philosophy of oneness might provide a foundation on which to anchor the fight for our climate and our survival” -- historian Andrea Wulf thinks that Friedrich Schelling is just what the environmental movement needs (NYT)
  • Philosophy professor Robert Pinto (Windsor), who died in 2019, was “one of tens of thousands of residents in Canadian long-term care homes without a psychosis diagnosis that have been prescribed antipsychotics” -- some commentary from Shelley Tremain, who links to a CBC investigative report
  • “We have to get used to the idea that there may be agents around who are just as intelligent and capable and involved and… committed or reliable as humans and that we need to think about how they matter” -- Peter Railton (Michigan) is interviewed by Katrien Devolder (Oxford) about how we should understand and interact with AI
  • How “dialogically dense” are different works of philosophy? -- a machine learning algorithm can determine the extent to which an author mentions other persons, and Alexander Klein (McMaster) used it to compare the works of James and Dewey

∙   2021 ©Daily Nous   ∙

wpDiscuz
0
0
Discussion welcome. Click to comment.x
()
x
| Reply