Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
Mind Chunks (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)
Home
Daily Nous Features

Mind Chunks (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)

By
Justin Weinberg
. July 25, 2017 at 12:53 pm 0

Mind Chunks
by Pete Mandik

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info About DN Comics / Pete Mandik on Twitter

 

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags Daily Nous Philosophy ComicsMind ChunksPete Mandik
6 likes
Login
guest
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

Miroslav Imbrisevic on Oldest Professorship in Philosophy Gets New Name

Thought experiment: If I offered them £ 5 Million to restore it to its original name, would they do it?
Matt L on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

I largely agree with this, but think this comment is underestimating how many university administrators will decide if there is "loss" or not, how they
David Wallace on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

Ultimately, if your teaching can be delivered through prerecorded lecture without loss, you're doomed anyway. Even if you can protect the intellectual property of your […]
David Wallace on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

"What if universities make thousands of hours of (ex hypothesi) high-quality recorded content available to large numbers of students so they can get an (albeit
John on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

Just to beat this stick one more time: Imagine the intellectual property claim goes through and the university is now amassing thousands upon thousands of […]
John on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

That might be a stopgap, for sure. But once the university catches whiff that an employee is intentionally damaging its intellectual property--because, again, intellectual property […]
Kenny Easwaran on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

There is a difference between working from home some days a week, and taking a job in a different city from the one where you […]
James Collinsworth on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

John is right about this. One thing that I know some people are doing to protect against this is to 'temporally sabotage' the lecture content, […]
John on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

Remote work has some advantages, there is no doubt. It also has disadvantages. We can all come up with a good list of each. But I […]
James Collinsworth on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

We need to be very very careful about this! Here is why (using the UK as an example). The price of electricity is expected to […]
Joona Räsänen on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

There was a postdoc in Jagiellonian University (Poland) and the add said remote work is a possibility. It was in philjobs a couple of months […]
remote postdoc on Remote-Working Positions in Academic Philosophy

I landed a postdoc right at the beginning of the pandemic that was supposed to be in person. The PI was thinking about canceling it […]

Subscribe

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

  • “Causal reasoning should be understood in ‘functional’ terms — that is in terms of the role that it plays in human life and the human goals and purposes that it serves” -- James Woodward (Pittsburgh) discusses "Causation with a Human Face" with others at a Brains symposium
  • “The misgivings that philosophers had about quantum mechanics, it turned out, weren’t entirely irrelevant after all. If physicists hadn’t been so dismissive of philosophy, they might have seen that sooner” -- Sabine Hossenfelder (Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies) on stagnation and progress in physics
  • “Unravelling his turgid prose turns out to be worth the effort, affording us glimpses of how things ‘hang together’ that others miss” -- William deVries (New Hampshire) on the "renaissance in Hegel appreciation" (via Preston Stovall)
  • Was Descartes “skull-blasted”? -- details on the controversy over where Descartes' skull is, and how many pieces it is in
  • “In recent months, and for the first time, I’ve been embarrassed to be a philosopher… Philosophy has a problem and that problem is hubris” -- says Stephen Mumford (Durham). Can you guess what prompted this?
  • Nicolas Cage as various philosophers -- from Hane Maung (Manchester)
  • “The philosopher has to be the bad conscience of his age” -- Richard Marshall interviews Friedrich Nietzsche at 3:16AM
  • “Collaborations with scientists can suffer when the cultural differences between disciplines are not acknowledged and tended” -- Michael Paul Nelson (Oregon State) has some advice for scientists and philosophers working with each other
  • Demographic data about people with philosophy PhDs -- results from the recent Academic Placement and Data Analysis project
  • “Let white students simply think that a Black professor is discriminating against them based upon race and see how quickly the white students are believed” -- some black people may have racial prejudices and individual power, but, says George Yancy (Emory), that is different from systemic racism
  • “That comedy is an important social safety valve and sometimes an epistemically useful window in a democracy also entails that it may be socially dangerous” -- Eric Schliesser (Amsterdam) on Chappelle, Srinivasan, Letterman, Trump, Aristophanes, and Socrates
  • “To compromise on the detail is to change the subject” -- an enjoyable and informative essay by Emmanuel Ordóñez Angulo (Oxford) on the challenges to and varieties of popularization in philosophy and mathematics
  • Speaker series on the nature of belief -- from the Concepts & Cognition Lab, hosted by Tania Lombrozo (Princeton) and Neil Van Leeuwen (Georgia State)
  • New publication by John Locke -- "the discovered manuscript provides the first evidence of Locke's commitment to the principle that minimalistic theism would suffice for peaceable coexistence in any civil society"
  • Reconceiving abortion as a public good -- so that the state has a compelling interest in people having access to it
  • “The position that I have in philosophy—I grew up poor, I am a Black woman, et cetera—means I have… very different evidence of what the stuff of anger actually looks like” -- Myisha Cherry (UC Riverside) interviewed in The New Yorker about anger and philosophy
  • What are and what should be the limits on scientific freedom? -- Heather Douglas (Michigan State) talks with Maria Kronfeldner (CEU) as part of a series on socially engaged philosophy
  • “The political/ideological takeover is the practice of using political positions to drive our philosophy (or drive out the rest of philosophy), rather than the other way around” -- an interview with Michael Huemer (Colorado) at What Is It Like To Be A Philosopher
  • Moral progress and moral methodology -- a conversation between Philip Kitcher (Columbia) and Julia Hermann (Utrecht) (scroll to the end for the link to the video)
  • “There is nothing in the nature of academic research that guarantees that ‘the best ideas of a generation will become part of the canon for the next generation’; instead, many good and original ideas have been lost to the disciplines through bad luck” -- consider, for example, the case of Ludwik Fleck
  • “There can be a lot of natural values, all equally valuable and natural, but different ones need different circumstances or social settings to be realized—so they will occur or flower at different times/places” -- an interview with Rachel Zuckert (Northwestern), who pays attention to "real tensions real facts about art and our appreciation of it"
  • “The life I lived, inside the walls of the house and outside, was in fact not one life but two, lives that sometimes complemented and supported each other, but mostly clashed against a reality I could not fully grasp” -- a profile of political philosophy Lea Ypi (LSE)
  • “Never call yourself a philosopher — let others do that” -- Spencer Case's appreciation of philosopher Bill McCurdy
  • “To ask only questions we can answer is a failure of imagination” -- a brief appreciation of philosophy from Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside)
  • “Imagining is not an alternative to reality and rationality or a diminished form of it. Imagining is a complementary form in our ways of knowing” -- Luca Tateo (Oslo) on a unified theory of imagining
  • The mathematics of heaps “looks like a living process” -- not about philosophy but this is the "heap" of links so file this under self-understanding
  • There will be a virtual memorial for Charles Mills on Sunday October 10, 2021, from 2pm to 5pm, EDT -- details are on the new Charles Mills memorial website
  • Audio of philosophy of science lectures from Voice of America’s “Forum: The Arts & Sciences in Mid-Century America” (1963) -- the series includes Quine, Hempel, Goodman, Black, Nagel, Putnam, Levi, Morgenbesser, Feyerabend, Suppes, and others (via Boaz Miller)
  • “What are memoirists doing exactly, when we claim to ‘find’ this form and meaning in our past experience? Are we genuinely discovering it back there or just making it up?” -- Helena de Bres (Wellesley) on the philosophy of memoirs
  • “My model of the world is that there are many, many, many thinkers, ideas and texts that are sufficiently interesting to merit serious consideration” -- why Liam Kofi Bright (LSE) opposes philosophical canons

∙   2021 ©Daily Nous   ∙

wpDiscuz
0
0
Discussion welcome. Click to comment.x
()
x
| Reply