Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • image/svg+xml Ello Ello

Daily Nous

Daily Nous

Primary Navigation

  • About
  • Comments Policy
  • Open, Live, Online Philosophy Events
  • Philosophy Comics
  • Value of Philosophy
  • Calls for Papers / Grants / Etc.
  • Non-Academic Hires
  • Supporters
  • Heap of Links
Mind Chunks (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)
Home
Daily Nous Features

Mind Chunks (Daily Nous Philosophy Comics)

By
Justin Weinberg
. November 1, 2016 at 12:04 pm 0

mandik-2016-11-1-eyeballs-teaser-2

Mind Chunks
by Pete Mandik

mandik-2016-11-1-eyeballs

Other Daily Nous Comics / More Info About DN Comics / Pete Mandik on Twitter

Daily Nous Philosophy Comics footer - Mandik

Categories Daily Nous Features
Tags Daily Nous Philosophy ComicsDescartesMind ChunksPete Mandik
5 likes
Login
guest
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paid Advertisements

Recent Comments

Adam Rigoni on Data on Philosophy PhDs in Non-Academic Positions

Just reading some of the responses in the post at the Cocoon shows that one of the non academic respondents is a CEO and another […]
Brian Weatherson on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

I think the answer is yes about silos but the number isn't the right way to measure them. All it takes is one person to […]
Brian Weatherson on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

Here's a path of 4, though I suspect it could be lower - there are so many Rutgers connections. (Does Oxford Studies count? I'm not […]
MJF on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

I am pretty sure you mean this as a joke, but this is a horrible idea. Lots of the candidates for what you are looking […]
Non-native on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

Is this for real? I understand that it took you "literally years and literally hours every week" to learn a language for leisure (kudos to […]
David on Data on Philosophy PhDs in Non-Academic Positions

Thanks Carolyn! I totally believe there's a significant difference between academic and non-academic salaries. After all, I currently hold both academic and non-academic positions and […]
Sober number on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

Elliott Sober has probably co-authored with at least 40 different people over the years - not as many perhaps as Hawthorne but close and
Carolyn Dicey Jennings on Data on Philosophy PhDs in Non-Academic Positions

Maybe worth noting: we ran a regression analysis on the salary data in 2017 and found the difference to be statistically significant: https://www.dropbox.com/s/61qgeway2nyhr7x/APDA2017FinalReport.pdf?dl=0 "The analysis […]
David Wallace on Co-Authorship in Philosophy over the Past 120 Years (by Bourget & Weinberg)

I can bound Stich's Hawthorne Number (or vice versa) at 6: Mallon, Machery, Nichols, and Stich, PPR 79 (2009) pp.332-356. Knobe, Lombrozo and Machery, Rev.Phil.Psych. 2 (2010) […]
Kevin on Data on Philosophy PhDs in Non-Academic Positions

I'm curious about data for graduate students earn an MA but leave their program before finishing a PhD. For alt-ac fields, I wonder if there
David on Data on Philosophy PhDs in Non-Academic Positions

With such a small sample size a couple of outliers can really bring that mean up. For example, if there's a single CEO in there […]
Yael on Levelling the Linguistic Playing Field within Academic Philosophy (guest post)

Hi Daniel, thanks for the kind words. It was good to get some rest, for sure. I am happy we seem to be at least […]

Subscribe

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
Paid Advertisements
Paid Advertisements

Heap of Links

  • “The position that I have in philosophy—I grew up poor, I am a Black woman, et cetera—means I have… very different evidence of what the stuff of anger actually looks like” -- Myisha Cherry (UC Riverside) interviewed in The New Yorker about anger and philosophy
  • What are and what should be the limits on scientific freedom? -- Heather Douglas (Michigan State) talks with Maria Kronfeldner (CEU) as part of a series on socially engaged philosophy
  • “The political/ideological takeover is the practice of using political positions to drive our philosophy (or drive out the rest of philosophy), rather than the other way around” -- an interview with Michael Huemer (Colorado) at What Is It Like To Be A Philosopher
  • Moral progress and moral methodology -- a conversation between Philip Kitcher (Columbia) and Julia Hermann (Utrecht) (scroll to the end for the link to the video)
  • “There is nothing in the nature of academic research that guarantees that ‘the best ideas of a generation will become part of the canon for the next generation’; instead, many good and original ideas have been lost to the disciplines through bad luck” -- consider, for example, the case of Ludwik Fleck
  • “There can be a lot of natural values, all equally valuable and natural, but different ones need different circumstances or social settings to be realized—so they will occur or flower at different times/places” -- an interview with Rachel Zuckert (Northwestern), who pays attention to "real tensions real facts about art and our appreciation of it"
  • “The life I lived, inside the walls of the house and outside, was in fact not one life but two, lives that sometimes complemented and supported each other, but mostly clashed against a reality I could not fully grasp” -- a profile of political philosophy Lea Ypi (LSE)
  • “Never call yourself a philosopher — let others do that” -- Spencer Case's appreciation of philosopher Bill McCurdy
  • “To ask only questions we can answer is a failure of imagination” -- a brief appreciation of philosophy from Eric Schwitzgebel (UC Riverside)
  • “Imagining is not an alternative to reality and rationality or a diminished form of it. Imagining is a complementary form in our ways of knowing” -- Luca Tateo (Oslo) on a unified theory of imagining
  • The mathematics of heaps “looks like a living process” -- not about philosophy but this is the "heap" of links so file this under self-understanding
  • There will be a virtual memorial for Charles Mills on Sunday October 10, 2021, from 2pm to 5pm, EDT -- details are on the new Charles Mills memorial website
  • Audio of philosophy of science lectures from Voice of America’s “Forum: The Arts & Sciences in Mid-Century America” (1963) -- the series includes Quine, Hempel, Goodman, Black, Nagel, Putnam, Levi, Morgenbesser, Feyerabend, Suppes, and others (via Boaz Miller)
  • “What are memoirists doing exactly, when we claim to ‘find’ this form and meaning in our past experience? Are we genuinely discovering it back there or just making it up?” -- Helena de Bres (Wellesley) on the philosophy of memoirs
  • “My model of the world is that there are many, many, many thinkers, ideas and texts that are sufficiently interesting to merit serious consideration” -- why Liam Kofi Bright (LSE) opposes philosophical canons
  • “In sex of all things, where humans so often misconstrue what other humans want… can we ever trust ourselves to know, really know, what an animal wants?” -- Amia Srinivasan (Oxford) takes an unflinching look at bestiality
  • In Memo Akten’s ‘Learning To See’, “an artificial neural network loosely inspired by our own visual cortex, looks through cameras and tries to make sense of what it sees” -- "Of course it can only see what it already knows. Just like us."
  • “It is morally imperative to not say true things on social media” -- Justin E. H. Smith on the "false representative class" today's technology has spawned
  • “The visual image can no longer compete. Video is dead. Videogames seek to evolve into—or devolve back into—text-based games, so far with little success” -- a fascinating short story from philosopher John Holbo (NUS) about a world in which how people read has radically changed
  • “I sometimes wonder whether it’s news to most philosophers that ‘A = A’ can be funny and even is the structure, or the form, of the perfect joke” -- a philosopher's appreciation of comedian Norm McDonald, who died in September
  • It’s likely we’ll find that “being conscious, much like being alive, has many different properties that will express in different ways… among different species, among different systems” -- and so, says neuroscientist Anil Seth, "the mystery of consciousness may dissolve"
  • “One reason most humanities professors wouldn’t consider themselves humanists: they’re too busy pretending to be scientists” -- by looking at the ideas of Charles Babbitt, we can see reasons to "jumpstart an omni-cultural humanist revival"
  • A Facebook group for faculty and graduate students in philosophy who were first-generation college students -- created by Georgi Gardiner (Tennessee)
  • “Our knowledge of ourselves is (meta)knowledge like any other – hard-won, and always subject to revision” -- Stephen M. Fleming (UCL) on the science of metacognition
  • “We don’t even claim that it is rehabilitative, although it might be, but we do claim that it takes people seriously” -- an article about philosophy in prisons, based on discussions with MM McCabe and Mike Coxhead (KCL)
  • “The fact that the term ‘mob’ can function pejoratively creates a paradox” -- an interview with Susanna Siegel (Harvard) on mob violence and vigilantism
  • “Rationality is systematized winning.” “It’s not winning I’m worried about… I want to know the truth.” -- a teacher and a student talk about the limits of rationality
  • Is the ball helping the mouse get to the cheese? -- Do we "see" free will? After watching the video, click on the PDF link for an explanation of a new "perceptual" approach to free will attribution.
  • “As a scholar, I could not do my job if I accepted the sort of ‘reasoning’ we are given for the cruel arrangements under which we labor” -- "And that is the fundamental bullshit on which all the bullshit sits," writes Amy Olberding (Oklahoma)
  • “In everyday life we often experience cities as beautiful… however, the city is only a marginal topic in aesthetics” -- Tea Lobo (Collegium Helveticum) on the aesthetics of cities

∙   2021 ©Daily Nous   ∙

wpDiscuz
0
0
Discussion welcome. Click to comment.x
()
x
| Reply