Alex Guerrero (U. Penn) looked at four leading journals in moral and political philosophy to see how they have been doing in terms of racial and ethnic diversity over the past decade. Some findings:
- 0.9% of authors 1.6% of editors are racialized as black
- 1.2% of authors and 0% of editors are Latina/Latino
- 4.9% of authors and 4.3% of editors are Asian
- 18.2% of authors and 10.3% of editors appear to have English as a foreign language
This is perhaps particularly troubling given the fact that there is a common assumption that although philosophy, in general, has a serious problem in terms of the racial and ethnic diversity of the field, things are somewhat better in moral and political philosophy. And it is particularly troubling, too, because moral and political philosophy are often viewed as areas in which both (a) what is studied and written about and (b) how one writes about and studies a subject may be influenced by one’s particular life experiences.
What does it say about our profession if this is what [these journals] look like, particularly given the distinctive racial/ethnic character of many of the most pressing moral and political issues?
More details about the study are posted at Discrimination and Disadvantage.
(image: detail of “Iris, Tulips, Jonquils and Crocuses” by Alma Thomas)