Conference Anti-Harassment Wiki


The Geek Feminism Wiki, a site aimed primarily at people involved in computing and technology, has a “Conference anti-harrasment” page. Brought to my attention by Maarten Steenhagen (thanks!), the site has a sample conference anti-harassment policy, a resource page with suggestions and answers to frequently asked questions, and other information.

In answer to the question, “Why have an anti-harassment policy?” the authors answer:

You want to put on a professional, friendly, reputable conference. You go to great lengths to make sure everyone has a good experience at your conference and wants to come back next year. Then some jerk gives a talk with pornographic slides, or gropes several women, or makes bigoted comments. You were too shocked to do anything about it at the time, and now your conference is all over the blogosphere as “the conference where that guy showed porn.” Unfortunately, this isn’t a hypothetical situation. Plenty of other conferences have run into this kind of problem before.

They add, in the “But I shouldn’t have to do this!” section:

Giving explicit directions to your speakers and participants about unacceptable behavior at a conference may seem unnecessary or insulting – and depending on the size of your conference and your speaker selection and admission process, it may be unnecessary. However, past experience shows that some people do need acceptable and unacceptable behavior spelled out precisely. Some people, including some of those who find basic social interaction stressful, may welcome a concrete list of unacceptable behaviors so they can be more confident that they will not accidentally violate an unwritten rule… Use your judgment on the level of detail needed for your conference, but err on the side of giving your conference participants the information they need to succeed.

Are conference anti-harassment policies needed in philosophy? Or are the size and speaker selection and admissions processes of philosophy conferences generally such that these kinds of policies are “unnecessary or insulting”?

guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Buck Field
6 years ago

The site is not ready for public viewing/promo.

The page at http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy does not have “a sample conference anti-harassment policy”, although it does (inaccurately) state: “This is an example anti-harassment policy…”;

It does list of 3 types of policies (short, med, long), with placeholder reminders that someone needs, for example, to: “Insert medium public version of policy here.”

I look forward to seeing the completed site.Report

Sebastian Lutz
6 years ago

You misunderstood the structure of the page: ‘$CONFERENCE’ is a placeholder for the name of the conference that the policy is meant to be for. ‘[URL for full anti-harassment policy]’ is a placeholder for just that: You should replace it with a link to the full policy. ‘[Insert medium public version of policy here.]’ means that you should include the text that is given in the previous paragraph, entitled ‘Medium public version’. The result is the long version of the policy.Report