A ____________ of Philosophers (Friday Fun)
A pride of lions, a murmuration of starlings, a dazzle of zebras, an eloquence of lawyers, a pack of lies — the English language has some unusual names for collectives. Sometimes the collective names apply only when the members of the groups are engaged in certain actions, for example, a group of ducks swimming is a raft of ducks, while a group of ducks flying is a string of ducks. And sometimes different names apply depending on the size of the group. For instance, a group of wildfowl (that’s right, wildfowl; I use that word all the time) may be known as a plump, but if that group has fewer than thirty members you should call it a knob.
Clearly there are a number of questions here, starting with whether there was something better I could have used as the fifth word in this sentence. Also, what should we call a collection of philosophers? Should there be different names for different specializations? For different styles of philosophy? For different stages of career or different demographic qualities? For philosophers engaged in different kinds of actions?
The Philosophical Lexicon offers up “cohen” as a its name for a collection of philosophers, but it has never really gained currency. This is your chance to make your mark on history. Give us our names. (If we have a number of good options, maybe I’ll run a poll so we can select the best ones.)
Relatedly, I offer:
quicksand. n. pl. a collection of blog comments. Example: “Alice made the mistake of stepping into that quicksand of comments and now no matter what she says things just keep getting worse.”
I look forward to seeing a quicksand of comments answering the questions in this post.
A ‘critical mass’.
A dissent of philosophers.
A confusion of philosophers.
Credit goes to either Josh May or Matt King. We had this discussion here at UAB the other week, but as there was a confusion of philosophers involved, I don’t remember exactly who suggested the term.
skeleton. branching. plot. scape. constellation.
…i like metaphors suggesting charting of the logical space of arguments.
Digression.
An argument of philosophers?
A morass, quibble, or distinction of philosophers.
Perhaps we could expand this to specific subfields, e.g. a set of logicians, a dilemma of ethicists, a composition of metaphysicians, a doubtfulness of epistemologists, and so on.
I’d be remiss if I didn’t note the results of a contest about this a few years ago on the now-defunct “Flickers of Freedom” blog. (The winner was a fog of philosophers.) See here for details, links to other entries, and so on:
http://gfp.typepad.com/the_garden_of_forking_pat/2008/03/contest-winner.html
A cat-herd of philosophers. (as can be observed when trying to take them out to dinner).
A fog of philosophers – It has alliteration and captures the state we’re in most of the time.
I seem to recall hearing this suggestion first from David Chalmers.
A crock.
In honor of Harry Frankfurt, a bullshitload of philosophers.
With a hat tip to Sider, a Roomful of metaphysicians. Also can be used as a verb, e.g. “there sure are a lot of metaphysicians rooming around here.”
A vat-full of brains.
Given that the collective noun for cobblers is “drunkenship”, I propose that given the (perhaps problematic) assumption that all philosophers are drunks, the collective noun for philosophers should be “cobblership”.
Not only is the symmetry nice, but I also like the idea that we are often in the business of fixing the things that others stand on.
I’m the “fog” guy. At least I’m in good company with Chalmers!
Gracias unfilosofo!
A ‘vagarity of philosophers’
A contingent—coz let’s face it, when is a group of philosophers ever necessary?
I prefer my collective nouns alliterative, so it should be either a “filibuster” or a “finicking” of philosophers.
A muddle of philosophers. Conjures images of a huddle and describes what philosophers do to issues and people.
A thought-experiment.
You can use it on its own, “of philosophers” becomes redundant.
A phalanx of philosophers, to keep alliteration alive. I also think a cabal of philosophers would work as well, on a more practical note.
1. Following Ford: A festoon of philosophers.
2. Or, we congregate in the wombats’ way: A wisdom of philosophers.
3. Or, we bundle as buffalo bunch: An obstinacy of philosophers.
There are a whole lot of suggestions at All Sorts (http://all-sorts.org) – the top-rated being ‘a refutation of philosophers’.
All Sorts is an experiment in harvesting charismatic collective nouns from Twitter. Lots of fun to browse!
a regress of philosophers
Husband got it: A Smoker Of Philosophers.
His others:
A priori of philosophers.
A proof of philosophers.
But I really like a Smoker best.
The word has to be derived from German. A Beziehung of philosophers? A Sachverhalt of philosophers? A Verstaendlichkeitsverbindung of philosophers!
A nexus of Process Philosophers.