What should humanities institutes at universities do? Among other things, “prompt general efforts toward identifying the varied roles that the humanities can play in 21st-century society,” says Robert Frodeman, a philosopher at the University of North Texas, in an essay at Inside Higher Ed. He argues that institutes should focus on the future and relevance of the humanities.
Such a focus would have researchers, preferably in interdisciplinary teams:
- Identify instances of success and failure in efforts to bring humanistic insights to nonphilosophic audiences, such as STEM researchers and policy makers in the public realm, and in corporations in the private realm;
- Develop techniques, approaches and perspectives—that is, best practices—for facilitating the transfer of useful insights to outside audiences; and
- Promote interdisciplinary projects with the STEM disciplines, as well as with schools of business, education and the like across the academy, as well as transdisciplinary projects with policy makers, NGOs, businesses and community groups within wider society.
- explore the historical development of the humanities;
- question whether the humanities should be viewed as “disciplines” at all;
- re-evaluate the role of rhetoric in humanistic education;
- theorize the problem of “dirty hands,” so that we can distinguish between judicious compromise and “selling out”;
- pursue challenges and opportunities tied to the continuing development of digital culture;
- rethink criteria for—and alternatives to—tenure and promotion;
- develop new indicators of success and impact for humanities scholarship;
- explore the seconding of humanities professors to other departments;
- create lab courses and internships for humanities students (undergraduate and graduate);
- identify new institutional locations for the humanities—e.g., storefronts at local shopping malls
Examples of such work already being done at existing humanities institutes (and similar institutions) are welcome.