A Flag for Utilitarianism


Does your philosophical view have a flag? If you’re a utilitarian, it does now. Johan E. Gustafsson, a lecturer in philosophy at the University of York, has designed a flag for utilitarianism. Here it is:

Why a flag for utilitarianism? Gustafsson explains that at his site, along with his design choices. The five stars represent five distinctive aspects of utilitarianism: inclusiveness, impartiality, hedonism, aggregation, and indifference to distribution. They also represent individuals. Gustafsson says, “The number of stars mirrors the number of points of each star. This reflects the utilitarian ideal that the collective should be treated as if it were one and the same individual.” Of course, the smile reinforces the hedonistic aspect of utilitarianism. And that’s just part of the design story.

Gustafsson does not take up the question of whether the time he took to design the flag could have been used to more effectively bring about a greater balance of happiness over suffering. Nor does he argue that a world in which people have the prerogative to put aside utility-maximizing in order to pursue projects such as flag design is a better world than one in which they do not. Perhaps pursuing either of those lines of thought would not have produced as much happiness as the amusing idea of a flag for a philosophical view. It is kind of fun.

So let’s join in: design a flag for a philosophical view and email it to me at [email protected]. Don’t forget to send along the name of your view. I’ll update this post with your designs.

(via William MacAskill)

(note: The flag in the original post has been replaced with a very slightly modified version.)


MORE PHILOSOPHICAL FLAGS

Trivialism (Jonathan van Belle)

Trivialism (Jonathan van Belle)

“I created this flag for the fringe view of ‘Trivialism’ (defended by Paul Kabay, a former PhD student of Graham Priest’s). Trivialism is the view that all propositions are true, including false propositions. Trivialism bites the bullet on the so-called Principle of Explosion.” — Jonathan van Belle


 

Coherentism

Coherentism

Coherentism (in justification): The basis for rejecting a proposition is that it just doesn’t fit with the others. That’s all there is.


 

Impaired Collectivism (Marcus Hedahl)

Impaired Collectivism (Marcus Hedahl)

“Cat Leviathan will kill us all.”


Utilitarianism (Daniel Kokotajlo)

Utilitarianism (Daniel Kokotajlo)

There are 4 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  
Please enter an e-mail address