Cosmopolitanism and Diversity in Philosophy

“The reason why most Anglo-American philosophers don’t worry about learning non-Western philosophy is that they assume cosmopolitanism is an ideal developed by Western philosophy. This assumption can create an amazing amount of institutional inertia. Western philosophers assume that the tradition of Plato and Spinoza and Russell just is the cosmopolitan tradition, and that it is up to non-Western traditions to join in with the Enlightenment. In this sense, there’s an assumption of inequality between Western and non-Western philosophical traditions: Western philosophy is not really Western because it is actually universal, and non-Western philosophy is really only a local tradition that should merge with Western philosophy.” More here, from Bharath Vallabha, a former assistant professor of philosophy at Bryn Mawr, who was educated at Cornell and then Harvard.

There are 7 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please enter an e-mail address